Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Open Access

Jagdish et al

Greener Journal of  Agricultural Sciences Vol. 4 (6), pp. 232-237, July 2014.

 ISSN: 2276-7770 © 2011 Greener Journals

Research Paper

Manuscript Number: 011314034

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2014.6.011314034


Evaluation of some Bio- pesticides against some Important Lepidopteron Pests of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) at Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India

 

Jaba Jagdish*, Meena Agnihotri and Rakesh Sharma

 

Department of Entomology, GBPUAT, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.


*Corresponding Author’s Email: jaba.jagdish@gmail.com

Abstract:

The field experiment conducted to evaluate the relative efficacy of eight biopesticides against gram pod borer  Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), legume pod borer, Marucavitrata (Geyer) and E. zinkenellainfesting Pigenopea during Kharif season 2010. The population was recorded at different days after spraying of insecticides and it was found that the number of larvae varied non- significantly different from the control in both spray application. Significant effect of bio-pesticides on per cent webbing by M. vitrata,  at First spray application showed minimum (32.00/25shoots) in  NSKE 5.0 % @ 50 g/lit .The pod borer M. vitrata was found lowest in Spinosad 45%ww @73g.ai/ha (4.50%) , followed by NSKE 5 %  (4.81%)  and B. bassiana DOR SC @ 1.89gm/lit (5.39%) as compared to control (14.49%). The per cent pod damage by H. armigera varied significantly which was minimum (27.84%) in Spinosad 45%ww @73g.ai/ha followed by B. bassiana WP @ 1.5kg/ha (28.58%) and B. bassiana DOR SC @ 1.89gm/lit (28.73%)  in comparison to control (51.68%). Grain yield varied from maximum of 1200 kg/ha in Spinosad 45%ww @73g.ai/ha followed by 1191.67 kg/ha in B. bassiana DOR SC @ 1.89gm/lit as compared to 708.33kg/ha in untreated control.

Keywords: Bacillus thuringiensis, Beauveriabassiana, Helicoverpa armigera, insecticides, Marucavitrata, NSKE 5%, microbials, pigeonpea, spinosad.


Reference:


Anonymous, (2007). The  medium  term  plan. ICRISAT,  Patancheru  502324,  Andhra Pradesh, India, 3.

Darmasena  SMD, Subasinghe  SMC, Lateef  SS, Menike S,  Saxena  KB and Ariyaratne  H.P.  (1992). In:  Pigeonpea Varietal Adaptation  and  production  studies  in Sri  Lank,  Report  of  Work.  Department  of Agriculture,  Sri Lanka,  ICRISAT,  Patancheru, Andhra  Pradesh,  India.  Entomology  Research, 104-108 PP. 

Jeyarani S and  Karuppuchamy  P.  (2010). Investigations  on  the  enhancing  efficacy  of granulovirus  on  nucleopolyhedrovirus  of Helicoverpa  armigera  (Hubner).  Journal  ofBiopesticides, 3(1): 172-176.

Mittal  V and  Ujagir  R  (2005).  Evaluation  of naturaly tespinosad against pod borer complex in  early  pigeonpea.  Indian  Journal  of  Plant Protection, 33(2): 211-215.

Rao GVR, Kumari PRA, Rao VR and Reddy YVR (2007). Evaluation of  spinosad and  indoxacarbfor  the management of  legume pod  borer,Marucavitrata  (Geyer)  in Pigeonpea.  Journal  of  food  legumes,20(1): 126-127.

Saxena  KB,  Chandrasena  GDSN, Hettiarachchi K,  Iqbal YB, Fonseka HHD and Jayasekara SJBA (2002).Evaluation of pigeon pea accessions and selected  lines  for reaction to Maruca. Crop Science, 42: 615-618.

Sreekanth M and Seshamahalakshmi  M (2012). Studies  on  relative  toxicity  of  biopesticides  to  Helicoverpa  armigera(Hubner) and Marucavitrata (Geyer) on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) Journal  of Biopesticides. 5(2): 191-195.

Shanower  TG,  Romeis J  and  Minja EM (1999). Insect  pests  of  pigeonpea  and  their management.  Annual  Review  of  Entomology, 44: 77-96

Sharma HC  (1998).  Bionomics,  host  plant resistance  and  management  of  legume  pod borer,  Marucavitrata  –  a  review.  Crop Protection, 17: 373-386.

Yadav GS,  and Dahiya B (2004). Evaluation  of new  insecticides/  chemicals  against  pod  borer and  pod  fly  on  pigeonpea.  Annals of Biology, 20(1): 55-56.