Greener Journal of Educational Research

Open Access

Subscribe to 

our monthly News letters

Impact Calculation


Greener Journal of  Educational Research Vol. 4(4), pp. 099-106July 2014

 ISSN: 2276-7789 © 2014 Greener Journals

Research Paper

Manuscript Number: 0523014243


Traditional or Conveyor belt marking: Exploring the way forward at Great Zimbabwe University, Zimbabwe


Joshua Risiro


Lecturer, Department of Curriculum Studies, Great Zimbabwe University, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.


Email: jrisiro @ gmail .com


The purpose of the study was to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the current traditional marking and explore possibilities and challenges of introducing conveyor belt marking at Great Zimbabwe University. Individual interviews were carried out for students enrolled in the Bachelor of Education Programmes. Lecturers who have been involved in conveyor belt marking were purposefully sampled to answer questionnaires. There are possibilities of introducing belt marking at the Institution. Students were more supportive of using belt marking unlike the Lecturers who pointed out too many challenges before implementing it. The challenges experienced in belt marking were organisational and management of the marking process. The solutions to the challenges involved identifying subject specialists across the University departments, staff recruitment and in service training for Staff. Departmental Chairpersons and Subject Coordinators across Faculties need to liaise with each other for the smooth running of the marking.

Keywords: Traditional marking; Conveyor belt marking; Marking reliability; Possibilities; Challenges.


Baird J [1989]. what is a name? Experiments with blind marking in a level Examinations. Educational Research, 40:191-202.

Bukenya M [2006]. Comparing the Reliability of the Conveyor Belt Marking System with  the Traditional Marking System: A paper Presented at the 32nd IAEA Annual Conference,Singapore,22nd -26 may,2006.

Chamberlain S, Taylor R [2010]. Online or Face- to- Face? An Experimental Study of Examiner Training. British Journal of Educational technology, vol.412, issue 4, pp.665-675, July 2011. East African Community Meeting of Secondary Education Examination Report, 2010.

Gall MD, Borg, Gall[1986]. Educational research: An Introduction. New York: Longman Publishers.

Manyumba D, Mutwiri JG [2009]. The Kenyan National Examination Council: Challenges Associated with Implementation of Control Mechanisms in Public Examinations and How the Kenya National Examinations Council [KNEC] has handled some of these challenges: A Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Assessment in Africa [AEAA], Yaonde, Camerron, and August 24 – 28, 2009.

Mashoko,D,. Mateveke,P,. Kufakunesu,M,. Mashoko,E.[2013].Public Examinations: A Fair Deal or a Burden?The Zimbabwean Experience: International Journal of English and Education, Vol.2, Issue 3,July, 2013.

McMillan JH, Schumacher S [1993]. Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction, 3rd Ed. New York: Harper Collins.

Meadows, Billington L [2007]. NAA Enhancing the Quality of Marking Project: Final Report for Research on Marker Selection. London, QCA. Available at: marker selection pdf (accessed 10 may2014).

Ngara, R, Ngara, R. [2013]. Conveyor Belt Marking: Opinions of ZIMSEC Markers in Chikomba District. Hope Journal Research (House of Pakistani Educationists), Vol,1, Issue 2, June, 2013.

Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulations (Ofqual) Interim Report [2013].Review of Quality Marking in Exams in A levels, GCSEs and Other Academic Qualifications.

Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulations (Ofqual) Interim Report [2014]. Quality of Marking: Review of Literature on Item Level Marking.

Ofqual [2011]. Inquiry into Examination Errors Summer 2011 Final report. Available at: [Accessed 3 May, 2014].

Palomba CA, Banta TW [1999]. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing and Improving Assessment in higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 4pp.

Pinot de Moira [2011]. Why Item Mark? The Advantages and Disadvantages of E-Marking. Machester, AQA, Centre for Education Research and Policy. Accessed at: (retrieved 10 May, 2014).

Rwanda Focus, Thursday, 28 March, 2009.

Spear M [1996].The Influence of Halo Effects upon Teachers’ Assessment of Written Work. Research in Education, p85.cited in Meadows M and Billington L [2005]. A Review of the Literature on marking reliability. Manchester, AQA. Available at: (accessed 10 May, 2014).

Suto I, Nadas R, Bell J [2011]. who should mark what? A study of factors affecting marking accuracy in Biology Examination. Research paper in education, Taylor and France Online. Available at: (Retrieved 10 May, 2014).

Tisi J, Whitehouse G, Manghan S, Burdett [2013]. A Review of Literature on Marking Reliability Research (Report for Ofqual).Slough National Foundation for Educational Research. Available at: (retrieved 10 may, 2014).

Wheadon C, Pinot de Moira A [2013]. Gains in marking reliability from item level marking: Is the sum of the parts better than the whole? Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice,19:8,665-679,Dol:10.1080/13803611.2013.828629.