Greener Journal of Business and Management Studies

Open Access

 



 

Subscribe to 

our monthly News letters
Click





Impact Calculation




Greener Journal of  Business and Management Studies  Vol. 4 (3), pp. 092-102, July 2014

 ISSN: 2276-7827 ©  2014 Greener Journals

Research Paper

Manuscript Number: 060314264

 

Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Farming Agribusiness of Efficiency Analysis and Supply Behavior at Bumiaji, Batu-Indonesia

 

Andrean Eka Hardana*1, Yeong-Shenn Lin2,

Abdul Wahib Muhaimin3 and Syafrial Darmansyah4

 

1Master Student, Department of Agriculture Social Economic, University of Brawijaya and Department of

Agribusiness Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology.

2Department of Agribusiness Management, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

3,4Department of Agriculture Social Economic, University of Brawijaya, Malang-Indonesia.


*Corresponding Author’s Email: andreanhardana @yahoo .co.id

Abstract:

Batu city as an administrative region islocated in East Java. The level of productivity of carrots in Batu reached 17.94 tons/ha, harvested area reached 509 hectares and production reached 9,132 tons. The aims of the research are: (1) To analyze the allocation of carrot production factors in Bumiaji district of Batu city, (2) To analyze the efficiency level of carrot production factors in Bumiaji district of Batu city, (3)To analyze the return to scale of carrot production factors in Bumiaji district of Batu city; and (4) To analyze the factors that influence supply behaviour of carrots in Bumiaji district of Batu city. Production factors are a significant effect of seed, labor, and pesticides. Results NPMx/Px or the value of marginal productivity of each input (NPMxi) that indicatesefficiency level at an input price (Px) for seed is 4.19 > 1, so it is not efficient. NPMx/Px for the use of pesticides is equal to 0.84 < 1, so it is not efficient. NPMx/Px for labor is 2.63 > 1, so it is not efficient. Production function model shows that the elasticity is 0.905 on a constant return to scale. Three variables that significantly affect the supply behavior of carrots are the harvest area in time t, the real producer price of carrot in time t, and the real retailer price of carrot in time t. Suggestions that can be given are to address the optimal use of seeds that have not been added in the area of 1 hectare of 108.61 kg and 739.11 for labor HOK. Variables of the real fertilizer price in time t and the real pesticide price in time t are not significant to the level of supply behaviour. It is necessary to be reduced in implementation in their farm.

Keywords: Production, return to scale, elasticity, supply behavior.

Reference:


Baklish and Hassan S (2007). Relationship between Technical Efficiency and Managerial Ability: Evidence from Punjab, Pakistan. Faculty Working Paper, Department of Environmental and Resource Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Barrett CB, Bachke ME, Bellemare MF, Michelson HC, Narayanan S and Walker TF (2010). “Smallholder Participation in Agricultural Value Chains: Comparative Evidence from Three Continents.”MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich. Econpapers, http://econpapers.repec. org/RePEc: pra:mprapa:27829, accessed July 2011.

Boehlje M (2012). Mid-West Food and Agribusiness Executive Seminar.

Dawson P and Dobson S (2002). Managerial Efficiency and Human Capital: An Application to English Association Football. Managerial and Decision Economics, 23 (8): 471-486.

Fariyanti  A  (2008). Perilaku ekonomi rumah tangga petani sayuran dalam menghadapi risiko produksi dan harga produk di Kecamatan Pangalengan Kabupaten Bandung disertasi. Institute of Bogor Agriculture. Bogor- Indonesia.

Giovannucci D (2012). Food and Agriculture: the future of sustainability. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development.

Gujarati D (2010). Dasar – dasar ekonometrika. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) (2012). Triennial Conference: Water and Food in the Bioeconomy- Challenges and Opportunities for Development;  Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.

Larsito S (2005). Analisis Keuntungan Usahatani Tembakau Rakyat dan Efisiensi Ekonomi Relatif Menurut Skala Luas Lahan Garapan. Thesis. Diponegoro university. Semarang-Indonesia.

Manalu H (2007). Analisis Finansial Usahatani Wortel. Skripsi. Departemen Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Studi Kasus Desa Sukadame Kecamatan Tigapanah Kabupaten Karo. Bachelor Thesis. Agriculture Faculty. University of North Sumatra. Medan-Indonesia.

Nicholson W (1995). Teori Mikro Ekonomi, Prinsip Dasar dan Perluasan, Alih Bahasa :Daniel Wirajaya, Edisi ke 5, Binarupa Aksara, Jakarta-Indonesia.

Onyido I (2006). Leveraging Research on Productivity and Efficiency. An Invited paper delivered at the 5th Agricultural summit of the Nigerian Economic Summit group held at the Le Meridian Hotel on 9th Nov.

Rylko, D. and Jolly, R.M. (2005). Development of Agroholdings in Russian Agriculture. Comparative Economic Studies. Volume 47, #(1): , pp.115–126.

Serova EU (2007). Vertical Integration in Russian Agriculture. In: Global Supply Chains. Standards and the Poor: How the Globalization of Food Systems and Standards Affects Rural Development and Poverty. Ed. J.Swinnen. CABI.

Shagaida N (2004). Agricultural Land Market in Russia: Living with Constraints. Comparative Economic Studies. 47(1): 1–14.

Soekartawi (1990). Teori Ekonomi Produksi dengan Pokok Bahasan Analisis Fungsi Cobb-Douglas.Rajawali Press, Jakarta.