Greener Journal of Medical Sciences

Excellence and Timeliness

  
  

Choose Language

Jumbo et al

Greener Journal of  Medical Sciences Vol. 3 (2), pp. 065-070, February 2013.

 ISSN: 2276-7797 © 2011 Greener Journals

Research Paper


Manuscript Number: 020413434

 

Comparison of Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) in the Assessment of Asthma Control and Usefulness of Act in a Resource Poor Setting

 

*Jumbo Johnbull,  Adewole Olanisun Olufemi

and  Erhabor Gregory Efosa

 

Department Of Internal Medicine, Faculty Of Clinical Sciences, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State.

 

*Corresponding Author’s Email:johnbulljumbo @ yahoo.com Tel: 08036774159;

Abstract:

Background: The gold standard in assessing asthma control is the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria. It is difficult to follow GINA criteria in assessing asthma control in resource poor settings because of the lack of access to pulmonary functions tests. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) questionnaire is a simple, self-administered, accessible and validated tool that is used in assessing control among asthmatics. The ACT has the added advantage that it does not require lung function assessment. However, its relationship with GINA guideline-defined asthma control has not been clarified in our setting.
Aim: The aim of this study is to assess asthma control through ACT and GINA, and to determine if the ACT can be as useful as the GINA-guidelines criteria in assessing asthma control in our setting.
Methodology: It was a cross-sectional analytical study. Asthma control was assessed by the ACT and GINA criteria questionnaires. Pulmonary function tests were performed on the subjects according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of ACT were determined.
Results: A total of 65 asthmatics participated in this study. The level of asthma control among the subjects was poor, 37% and 23% by ACT and GINA criteria respectively. There was a significant and positive correlation between the ACT and GINA. The Kappa score for the entire subjects was 0.66 representing a substantial agreement between the ACT and GINA.
Conclusion: Asthma control was poor among the subjects. The fact that ACT can predict GINA guidelines-based level of control further gives credence to its usefulness in a resource-poor clinical setting.

Key words: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), Asthma Control, Forced Expiratory Volume in one Second (FEV1).

Return to Content   View Reprint (PDF) (184KB)


Call for Papers/Books/Thesis

Call for Scholarly Articles


Authors from around the world are invited to send scholary articles that suits the scope of this journal. The journal is currently open to submissions and will process and publish articles monthly in two yearly issues.


The journal is centered on quality and goes about its processes in a very timely fashion. Seasoned editors/reviewers will be consulted to review each article(s), profer quality evaluations and polish the articles with expertise before publication.


Simply send your article(s) as an e-mail attachment to manuscripts@acad.gjournals.org or manuscripts.igj@gmail.com.


Call for Books


You are also invited to submit your books for online or print publication. We publish books related to all academic subject areas.    Submit as an e-mail attachment to books@journals.acadpub.online.


Call for Thesis



Search

Login Form

Newsletter


Site Visitors

visitor counter