Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science

Open Access

 


Subscribe to 

our monthly News letters
Click







Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science Vol. 3 (1), pp. 008-014, May 2015.

  ISSN: 2354-2292 © 2015 Greener Journals

Research Paper

Manuscript Number: 040915049

(DOI http://doi.org/10.15580/GJPBCS.2015.1.040915049)

 

Genotypic Variability for Agronomic Traits in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. R. Br.)

 

Omar Abdalla Bakhit1*, El Hag Hassan Abu Elgasim2

 

¹Pearl Millet Improvement Program,  Agricultural Research Corporation, El Obeid Research Station, P.O. Box 429 , Sudan.

²Former Director of El Obeid Research Station, Associate Professor , Agricultural Research Corporation, P.O. Box 429 , Sudan. (E-mail: elhaghasan@ yahoo. com)

 

*Corresponding Author’s E-mail: omarbakhit @yahoo. com


Abstract


The study was conducted to assess the variation, genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation and estimate broad sense heritability and genetic advancement as percentage of the mean for seventeen traits in 18 genotypes of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L. R. Br.). The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with four replications at four sites in 2006 cropping season. Analyses of variance revealed significant differences among genotypes for all traits studied except plant population/ha. The highest genetic coefficients of variation were detected for grain yield (31.44%), harvest index (30.96%), dry panicle weight (28.56%) and grain yield per plant (25.83%). The highest phenotypic coefficients of variation were shown by grain yield  (38.07%), harvest index (37.89%)  and grain yield /plant (35.03%). The values of phenotypic coefficient of variation were higher than their corresponding genotypic coefficient of variation for all studied. High heritability estimates were observed for threshing percentage (0.75), days to 50% flowering (0.74), days to 95% maturity (0.73) and dry panicles weight (0.73). The predicted genetic advancement as percentage of mean was found to be very high for grain yield) (53.47%), harvest index (52.2%) and dry panicle weight (50.13%).

 

Keywords: Pearl millet, genotypic coefficient of variation, phenotypic coefficient of variation, heritability, genetic advancement, variations.


Post-review Rundown

View/get involved, click [Post-review Page]


References


Abraham, M.J.; A.S Gupta and B.K, Sharma. (1989). Genetic variability and characters association of yield and its components in finger millet (Eleusin coracana) in an acidic soil of Meghalaya. Indian J of Agric. Sci. 59(9), 579-581.

 

Abuelgasim, E.H. (1999). Pearl millet breeding and improvement in Sudan (in Arabic). A paper presented in the monthly Scientific Forum, October 1999, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Khartoum.

 

Abuelgasim, E.H. (2001). Pearl millet production and popular varieties in the Sudan. Workshop on seed for small-scale farmers affected by disasters. Organized by FAO, Khartoum.

 

Burton, G.W. and E.M. De Vane. (1953). Estimating heritability in tall fescue (fescue arandiaeae L.) from replicated clonal material. Agron. J. 45, 478-481.

 

Chaudhry, M.H.; G.M. Subhani; M.S. Shaheen; and U. Saleem. (2003). Correlation and path coefficient analysis in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Pakistan J. Biol. Sci 6 (6), 597-600.

 

FAO. (2007). Production Year Book of Statistics.

 

Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.

 

Izge, A.U., A.M. Kadams; and D.T. Gungula (2006). Studies on characters association and path analysis of certain quantitative characters among parental lines of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and their f 1 hybrids in a diallel cross. African Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 1 (5), 194-198.

 

Johnson, H.W., Robinson, J.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimate of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron J., 47(7): 314-318.

 

Lakshmana, D. P. Surendra and R. Gurmurty (2003). [Genetic variability studies in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) genotypes]. Res. On Crops 4 (3), 355-357.

 

Mahawar, R. K.; K. C. Sharma and D. K. Jain. (2003). [Genetic variability in fodder bajra [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) Br.]] Res. On Crops 4 (3), 363-365.

 

Mohammed, M.A. (2005). Evaluation of ten Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br) Accessions under Rain-fed Conditions in Locality of Sheikan (North Kordofan state). M.Sc thesis. Faculty of natural resources and environmental studies. University of Kordofan.

 

Naeem, M.; M.S.M Chohan; A.H. Khan., and S. Slah-ud-Din. (2003).Study of green fodder yield potential and its components of different pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) Varieties under Irrigated Conditions of Faisalabad. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2 (1), 74-76.

 

Rachie, K.O. and J.V.M, Majmudar. (1980). Pearl Millet. Pennsylvania Univ. Press, University Park.

 

Rao, S.S. and A.P. Agrawal. (2000). Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient studies in barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentaceea). Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, (Vol. 34) (No. 1) 27-31.

 

Robinson, H.F.; R.E. Comstock and P.H. Harvey (1952). Genotypic and phenotypic correlations in corn and their implications in selection. Agron. J. 43, 282-287.

 

Stoskopf, N.C. (1985). Cereal Grain Crops. Reston Publishing Co. Inc., Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.