Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science

Open Access

 


Subscribe to 

our monthly News letters
Click







Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science Vol. 4 (3), pp. 071-080, May 2016.

  ISSN: 2354-2292 © 2015 Greener Journals

Research Paper

Manuscript Number: 050316082


(DOI: http://doi.org/10.15580/GJPBCS.2016.3.050316082)

 

Genotype × Environment Interaction for Grain Yield of Some Field pea Genotypes in Central and North Eastern Zones of South Region, Ethiopia

 

Ersullo LJ

 

Crop Research Process, Hawassa Agricultural Research Center, South Agricultural Research Institute, 

P.O.Box 6, Hawassa, Ethiopia.


Abstract


Plant breeders invariably encounter GE interactions when testing varieties across a number of environments. The objective of this study was to identify the stability of grain yield of fifteen field pea genotypes by determining GE interaction effects obtained by AMMI analysis and to select genotypes with better performances depending on the differential genotypic responses to environments. The study was carried out for two consecutive years (2011 - 2012) at three locations and for one year at three additional locations in 2012 (a total of 9 environments) in 5 administrative zones of South Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region, Ethiopia. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. To determine the effects of GE interaction on yields, the data were subjected to Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) analysis using GenStat 15thed. The result of combined analysis of variance for grain yield of 15 field pea genotypes tested across 9 environments showed that there is highly significant difference among the environments, genotypes and GE interaction with the contribution of 75.10, 7.95 and 16.94% sum of squares, respectively. The mean grain yield of the genotypes across the environments ranged from 1937.2 kg/ha for genotype G8 to 2755.3 kg/ha for G7, with a grand mean yield of 2248.2 kg/ha. The two best performing genotypes; G15 and G7 with relatively larger absolute IPCA-1 scores were found to have specific adaptations to some environments such as E1 and E7. According to yield stability index (YSI), the most desirable genotypes which can be considered as relatively adapted to wider environments and with grain yield above the grand mean were G4 and G2.

 

Key words: field pea genotypes, grain yield, G x E interaction, AMMI model, analysis of variance.


Post-review Rundown

View/get involved, click [Post-review Page]


References


Acikgoz, E., A. Ustun, I. Gul, E. Anlarsal, A. S. Tekeli, I. Nizam, et al., (2009). Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis for dry matter and seed yield in field pea (PisumsativumL.).Spanish J. of Agr. Research 7(1), 96-106

 

Alake. C.O and O.J Ariyo, (2012). Comparative Analysis of Genotype x Environment Interaction Techniques in West African Okra (Abelmoschuscaillei, A. ChevStevels). J. of Agr. Sci. 4(4): 4

 

Anandan, A., R. Eswaran, T. Sabesan and M. Prakash, (2009).Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of yield performances in rice varieties under coastal saline environments.Adv. in Biol. Res. 3 (1-2): 43-47.

 

Bose, L.K., N. N. Jambhulkar, K. Pande and O. N.Singh, (2014).Use of AMMI and other stability statistics in the simultaneous selection of rice genotypes for yield and stability under direct-seeded conditions.Chilean J. Agric. Res. vol.74 no.1.

 

Crossa, J (1990). Statistical analyses of multilocation trials. Adv. Agron. 4: 55-85

 

Crossa J, Gauch H G, Zobel RW (1990) Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Sci 30: 493-500

 

Crossa, J., P.N. Fox, W.H. Pfeiffer, S. Rajaram and H.G. Gauch, (1991). AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 27-37.

 

Debelo, D. S. Gelalcha, B. Yaie, B. Girma, B. Mamo and D. Masresha, (2004).Grain yield stability of bread wheat genotypes in favorable and stressed environments. 12th Regional Wheat Workshop for Eastern, Central and Southern Africa, pp: 76-85.

 

Dewi, A. K., M. A. Chozin, H. Triwidodo and H. Aswidinnoor, (2014). Genotype × environment interaction, and stability analysis in lowland rice promising genotypes. Int. J. of Agron.and Agri. Research. 5(5): 74-84

 

Ebdon, J.S. and H.G. Gauch (2002). Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Analysis of National Turf grass Performance Trials: II. Cultivar Recommendations, Crop Sci. 42:497–506

 

Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell, (1966).Stability parameters for comparing varieties.Crop. Sci. 6: 36-40

 

Ersullo L., Habtamu Z., and Adugna W. (2013).AMMI analysis of yields and oil content in some linseed (Linumusitatissimum L.) genotypes in south and central Ethiopia.Ethiopian J. of  Agri.sci.24:79-98

 

Farshadfar, E., and J. Sutka.(2006). Biplot analysis of genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat using the AMMI model.ActaAgronomicaHungarica 54(4):459-467.

 

Fekadu G., Ersulo L., Asrat A., Fitsum A., Yeyis R. and Daniel A.,  (2012). GGE-Biplot analysis of grain yield of faba bean genotypes in Southern Ethiopia.Electronic j. of plant breeding, 3(3): 898-907

 

FetienAbay and AsmundBjornstad. (2009). Identifying optimal testing environments of barley yield in the Northern Highlands of Ethiopia by Biplot Analysis. J. of Drylands 2(1): 40-47.

 

FisehaBaraki, YemaneTsehay and FetienAbay, (2015).AMMI Analysis of Genotype×Environment Interaction and Stability of Sesame Genotypes in Northern Ethiopia.Asian J. of Plant Sciences, 13: 178-183.

 

Gauch, H.G. and R.W. Zobel., (1996).AMMI analysis of yield trials.In: Kang, M.S. and Gauch, S.G. (eds) Genotypic-by-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Pp. 85-121 Boca Raton, FL

 

Gauch H.G., (2006). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE.Crop Sci. 46, 1488-1500.

 

Habtamu S. and Million F., (2013).Multivariate analysis of some Ethiopian field pea (PisumsativumL.) genotypes.Int. J. of Genetics and Molecular Biology 5(6): 78-87

 

Hassan Z., E. Farshadfar, S. H. Sabaghpour and R. Karimizadeh, (2012). Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in chickpea using measures of stability from AMMI model. Annals of Biological Research, 3 (7):3126-3136

 

Kaya, Y., C. Palta and S. Taner, (2002).Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions analysis of yield performance in bread wheat varieties across environments.Turk J. Agric. 26: 275-279.

 

Kumar, S. , D.K. Pandey, P.K. Singh and J. Singh, (2011). Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for sugarcane genotypes evaluated in multi-location trials.J. of Sugarcane Research 1(2) : 28-34

 

Makinde, S.C.O., and O.J Ariyo, (2011).Analysis of genotype x environment interaction of groundnut (Arachishypogaea L.).Appl. Biol. 40(2): 19–26 

 

Mukherjee, A.K., N. K. Mohapatra, L. K. Bose, N. N. Jambhulkar and P. Nayak, (2013). Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of GxE interactions in rice-blast pathosystem to identify stable resistant genotypes.Global Sci. Research J. 1(1): 103-118

 

Nassir A.L., O.J. Ariyo, (2011). Genotype x environment interaction and yield-stability analyses of rice grown in tropical inland swamp.Not Bot HortAgrobotCluj, 39(1):220-225

 

Odewale J. O., Ataga C. D., Agho C., Odiowaya G., Okoye M. N. and Okolo E. C. (2013). Genotype evaluation of coconut (Cocosnucifera L.) and mega environment investigation based on additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis. Res. J. of Agri. and Env. Management 2(1): 001-010

 

Ogunbayo, S.A., M. Sie, D.K. Ojo, A.R. Popoola, O.A. Oduwaye, I.O. Daniel, K.A. Sanni, M.G. Akinwale, B. Toulou, A. Shittu, G.B. Gregorio and E.F. Mercado, (2014). Comparative Performance of Forty-Eight Rice Genotypes in Diverse Environments Using the Ammi and GGE Biplot Analyses.Int. J. of Plant Breeding and Genetics, 8: 139-152.

 

Purchase, J.L., (1997).Parametric stability to describe GE interactions and yield stability in winter wheat. PhD. Thesis, Faculty of Agri., Univ. of Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

 

Purchase, J.L., H. Hatting and Cs.Vandenventer. (2000). Genotype by environments interaction of wheat in South Africa: stability analysis of yield performance. South Africa J. of plant sci. 17:  101-107.

 

Riaz, M., M. Naveed, J. Farooq, A. Farooq, A. Mahmood, Ch. M. Rafiq, M. Nadeem and A. Sadiq, (2013). AMMI analysis for stability, adaptability and GE interaction studies in cotton (GossypiumhirsutumL.).J. of Animal & Plant Sci, 23(3): 865-871

 

Romagosa, I. and P.N. Fox, (1993).Genotype x Environment interaction and Adaptation.In: Hayward, M.D. Bosemark, N.O. and Romagosa, I. (Eds.) Plant Breeding: Principles and Prospects. Chapman and Hall, London. Pp. 373-391.

 

Sabaghnia, N., M. Mohammadi and R. Karimizadeh, (2013).Parameters of AMMI Model for Yield Stability Analysis in Durum Wheat.Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus . Vol. 78 (2013) No. 2 (119-124)  

 

SAS (2000).SAS Linear Model: A Guide to ANOVA and GLM Procedures. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

 

Tamene T.T., Gemechu K., Tadese S., Mussa J. and Yeneneh B., (2013).Genotype x environment interaction and performance stability for grain yield in field pea (Pisumsativum L.) genotypes.Int. J. of plant breeding 7(2): 116-123.

 

Van Oosterom, E.J., D. Kleijn, S. Ceccarelli and M.M. Nachit, (1993).Genotype x Environment interactions of barley in the Mediterranean region.Crop Sci. 33: 669-74.

 

Yan W, and Rajcan I (2002). Biplots analysis of the test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario.Crop Sci. 42: 11-20

 

Yayis R.,  Agdew B. and Yasin G., (2014). GGE and AMMI biplot analysis for field pea yield stability in SNNPR state, Ethiopia. Int. J. of Sustainable Agr. Research, 2014, 1(1): 28-38

 

Zobel R.W., M.J Wright, H.G Gauch. (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial.Agronomy J. 80: 388-393.