Greener Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science Vol. 6 (1), pp. 001-006, January 2018.
ISSN: 2354-2292 © 2018 Greener Journals
Manuscript Number: 122017181
Performance of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes for Green Pod Yield and Quality in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia
Yosef ALEMU1*, Selamawit KETEMA1,
Melkamu HINSERMU1, Jibicho GELETO1,
Getachew TABOR2, Shimelis AKLILU1,
Gebeyehu WENDIMU1, Tesfa BINALFEW1
1Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, Melkassa, Ethiopia
2Debrezeit Agricultural Research Center, Debrezeit, Ethiopia
Multi-location variety trials were conducted to evaluate snap bean
genotypes for yield and quality in 2013 and 2014 at Melkassa and Debrezeit
agricultural research centers and Wonji. The experiment was laid out in RCBD
with three replications. Data on yield and yield contributing traits were
collected and subjected to environment wise analysis of variance followed by
pooled analysis. The pooled analysis of variance for marketable yield showed
significant difference (p< 0.01); and ranged from 7.5 t ha-1 to
9.14 t ha-1. Total green pod yield was also significant (p <
0.05); and ranged from 9.72 t ha-1 to 11.73 t ha-1 for
genotypes BC4.4 and Plati respectively. There was also significant difference
(p< 0.01) among genotypes in days to 50% flowering, pod diameter and length.
Genotype Plati had the largest pod diameter (7.02 mm) and length(119.3 mm). The
rest pod characters such as pod shape, color, fiber content and curvature were
also diverse among genotypes. On the basis of total yield (11.73 t ha-1)
and pod characters such as pod diameter(7.02 mm) and length(119.3 mm), low
fiber content, green pod color, smooth pod surface, straight
pod curvature and round pod shape, genotype Plati was identified as potential
variety and thus released for production in the Central Rift Valley and similar
agro-ecologies of Ethiopia
Keywords: Performance, Green pod yield, Pod characters, Snap bean genotypes
Abdel-Mawgoud AM R, MEL-Desuki, SR, Salman and SD Abou-Hussein (2005). Performance of Some Snap Bean Varieties as Affected by Different Levels of Mineral Fertilizers. Journal of Agronomy, 4: 242-247.
CIAT (International Center for Tropical Agriculture) (2006). Highlights of CIAT in Africa: Snap beans for income generation by small farmers in east Africa. Series. No.31: httpciat-library.ciat.cgiar.org/Articulos_Ciat/highlight31(accessed: November,2017)
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2013). Statistical Database of the Food and Agriculture of the United Nations.
Getachew A (2006). The market for fresh snap beans. The Strategic Marketing Institute, Working Paper.pp.6-8.
Hussein MB, Walley FL, Bueckert R, Tar'an B (2015). Response of Snap Bean Cultivars to Rhizobium Inoculation under Dryland Agriculture in Ethiopia. Agronomy 2015, 5, 291-308.
Kshouni D (2017). Varietal performance of bush type french bean varieties ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for growth, fresh pod yield and quality. M.Sc. (Horticulture) Thesis. Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya regional research station, West Bengal.
Lemma D (2003). Snap bean production and research status in Ethiopia. Research report.
Lemma D, Selamawit K, Abiyot A, Shimelis A (2006). Varietal development of major vegetables in the rift valley region. Proceeding of the Inaugural and first Ethiopian horticultural science society (EHSS), 27-30 March 2006. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
MoARD (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development) (2014). Plant variety release, protection and seed quality control directorate, crop variety register. Issue no. 16.
Pandey RY, Gautam DM, Thapa RB, Sharma MD, Padyal KP (2011). Variability of french bean in the western mid hills of Nepal. Kasetsart Journal of Natural Sciences.45 : 780 – 792.
Santalla M, Miguel A F, Rodino A, Paula IM, Antonio MR ( 1999). Breeding for culinary and nutritional quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.). pp.134-13.
USDA, 1995. Fresh-market snap beans: An economic assessment of the feasibility of providing multiple-peril insurance, the economic research service.