Greener Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 4 (5), pp. 143-153, September 2014
ISSN: 2276-7800 © 2014 Greener Journals
Manuscript Number: 1202131005
Humanizing Globalization in the Context of Remaking the South: A Pragmatic Dialectics Explored
Alex Igho Ovie-D’Leone
Department of Political Sciences, Osun State University, Osogbo, Nigeria.
Email: email@example.com or alexoviedleone @gmail .com
Globalization is generally seen as an ongoing universal change process occurring largely within a socially dynamic and mutually interactive context. It impacts radically and profoundly on all human communities simultaneously, but with varying intensities and outcomes. These changes have come with both real and hidden costs that further seek to widen the pervading gaps of socio-economic and political disparities in the usually contentious North-South cleavages. This dilemma also raises sundry questions that threaten to shake-up some of globalization’s fundamental assumptions and stereotypes premised on the claimant that it seeks to promote an evolving universal ethos - a sense of a common global village embracing all mankind. But as prevailing trends have shown in reality, globalization can be seen as an ominous vehicle merely seeking to perpetuate the continued dominance of the North over the South in a new remake that portends to further subjugate the latter exploitatively to the wily antics of the North. This paper argues that, both its logic and operating mechanics are totally at variance with the essence of a ‘universal brotherhood of humanity’ – that ideal notion of a globalist communitarian ethos shared by all mankind without discriminations or hypocrisies. Obviously, these shared values ideally are preconditions needed to promote sustainable peace, stability, growth/development on a global scale. The paper therefore concludes that, the lopsided outcomes of changes occasioned by ongoing globalization readily evoke a moral obligation and a duty on the part of the Southern elites to grasp initiatives at this instance of its ongoing remolding or remaking of the South. The South needs to regain its positional relevance in the mainstream of evolving global universalism currently sweeping across the world. Globalization mechanics ought now to be compelled one way or the other to wear humane faces – those that are cast in the imageries of veritable catalysts that dispense benefits equally to all human societies simultaneously without discriminations.
Keywords: Globalization, Commons Problems, Communitarian ethos, Universalism.
Alex Igho Ovie-D’Leone (PhD), Lectures International Relations/Politics at the Department of Political Sciences, Osun State University, Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria.
Black, Cyril E. (1966). The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study In Comparative History, New York: Harper and Row, 1966, pp. 1-34.
Coglianese, Cary. (1999). “The Commons Problem”, Being a paper presented at The 21st Century Conference, Harvard University, Brettons New Hampshire, USA.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1974). “Studies of Modernization And Sociological Theory”, History And Theory, Vol. 13, No. 3. October), pp. 225-252.
Fukuyama, Francis. (1989). “The End of History”, The National Interest, 16 (Summer), pp. 4 - 8.
Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War And Change In World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1998). Clash of Civilization And The Making of World Order, USA: Simon And Schumster, Inc..
Kaplan, Robert. (1994). “The Coming Anarchy”, Atlantic Monthly, 273 (February), pp. 44-76.
Keohane, Robert O. (1988). “International Institutions: Two Approaches”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4. (December), pp. 379-396.
Kennedy, Paul. (1988). The Rise And Fall of The Great Powers: Economic Change And Military Conflict From 1500 – 2000, Unwin: Hyman, pp. 646-667.
Krasner, Stephen D. (1993). “Westphalia And All That”, in: Goldstone And Keohane, eds., Ideas And Foreign Policy: beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 235-264.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 17-18
Layne, Christopher. (1993). “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise”, International Security, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Spring), p. 5-18.
Naipaul, V. S. (1990). “Our Universal Civilization”, The 1990 Wriston Lecture, The Manhattan Institute New Yorker Review of Books, 30 October.
Nye, Joseph, Jr., (1990). “The Changing Nature of World Power”, Political Science Quarterly, 105 (Summer), pp. 181-182.
Pipes, Daniel. (1983). In The Path Of God: Islam And Political Power, New York: Basic Books.
Robertson, Roland. (1987). “Globalization Theory and Civilizational Analysis”, Comparative Civilizational Review, 17 (Fall), pp. 22-45.
Tombee, Arnold J. (1961). Study of History, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 152-214.
Tilly, Charles. (1990). “Rise, Decline, Fall”, Reviewed Works: Michael W. DOYLE, Empires; Paul KENNEDY, The Rise And Fall Of The Great Powers: Economic Change And Military Conflict 1500-2000 in: Sociological Forum, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Jun., 1990), pp. 323-329
Waltz, Kenneth. (1993). “The Emerging Structure of International Politics”, International Security, 18 (Fall), pp. 44-79.
___ . (1991). “America As A Model For The World? A Foreign Policy Perspectives”, PS, December 1991, p. 669-743.
Weber, Max. (1930). Translations by Talcott Parsons and Anthony Giddens. The Protestant Ethic And The Spirit of Capitalism, London and Boston: Unwin Hyman.