Muduli et al
Greener Journal of Science, Engineering and Technological Research Vol. 4 (2), pp. 032-037, May 2014.
ISSN: 2276-7835 © 2011 Greener Journals
Manuscript Number: 022414122
Wetting and Drying Cycle Effect on Strength of Geopolymer Fly Ash Building Brick
S.D. Muduli*, J.K. Sadangi, S.M. Mustakim, B.D. Nayak and
CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
*Corresponding Author’s Email: surabhidipali @gmail .com
The purpose of this research work was to develop innovative environmental friendly building brick and study their performance, particularly on wetting and drying cycle. To understand the relative significance of these results geopolymer building brick with which different Na2O/(Al2O3+SiO2) has been manufactured. Geopolymer building brick has been manufacture by using highly alkaline solution and an aluminosilicate source. During this research work (230 × 110 × 75 mm) size building bricks were manufactured. After 25 days of atmospheric curing the bricks attained a crushing strength of 10 to 12 Mpa. Then the bricks were submerged in water to observe the effect of wetting and drying cycle on strength of brick. Results comprised that even after 10th cycle, there is no specific deterioration in the crushing strength of brick.
Keywords: Fly ash, geopolymer, wetting drying cycle & atmospheric curing.
Scarano J, Belz G and Dinelli G, (1998), Quality control and industrial reutilization potential of FGD gypsum, Ann. Chim. 88: 211–222.
Garg M, Singh M and Kumar R, (1996), Some aspects of durability of a phosphogypsum–lime–fly ash binder, Construct. Build. Mater. 10: 273–279.
Kumar S, (2002), A perspective study on fly ash–lime–gypsum bricks and hollow blocks for low cost housing development, Construct. Build.Mater. 16: 519–525.
Kumar S, (2003), Fly ash–lime–phosphogypsum hollow blocks for walls and partitions, Build. Environ. 38: 291–295.
Bakharev, T, Sanjayan, JG, & Cheng, YB, (1999a). Alkali activation of Australian slag cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(1), 113- 120.
Talling B, & Brandstetr J, (1989). Present State and Future of Alkali-Activated Slag Concretes. Paper presented at the third international conference on fly ash, silica fume, slag, and natural pozzolans in concrete, Trondheim, Norway.
Stevenson M, Sagoe-Crentsil K, (2005). Relationship between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers: part 1 – metakaolinderived inorganic polymers. Journal of Materials Science 40, 2023– 2036.
Davidovits J, (2005), The polysialate terminology: a very useful and simple model for the promotion and understanding of green-chemistry, In geopolymer, green chemistry and sustainable development solutions: proceedings of the world congress geopolymer 2005, Davidovits J., Geopolymer Institute, Saint-Quentin, France.:9-12.
Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ and Rangan BV, (2004a). Brief Review of Development of Geopolymer Concrete. George Hoff Symposium, American Concrete Institute, Los Vegas, USA.
Davidovits J, (2008), Geopolymer chemistry & applications, 2nd edn, chapters 15–16. Institute Ge´opolyme`re, Saint-Quentin, pp 333–365
Muduli SD, Sadangi JK, Nayak BD, and Mishra BK, (2013). Effect of NaOH concentration in manufacture of geopolymer fly ash building brick, Greener Journal of physical sciences, Vol. 3 (6): 204-211.
Nayak BD, Mishra BK, Behera S and Kumar V, (2009), Composition for building material and a process for the preparation there of, Pub. No.: US 2009/0250660 A1.
Wang L, Shao Y, Zhang J and Anpo M, (2006), Synthesis of MCM-48 mesoporous molecular sieve with thermal and hydrothermal stability with the aid of promoter anions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 95(1–3):17-25.
Desbats-Le Chequer C and Frizon F, (2011), Impact of sulfate and nitrate incorporation on potassium and sodium-based geopolymers: geopolymerization and materials properties, J Mater Science 46: 5657–5664.
Lee WKW and Van Deventer JSJ, (2002), Effects of anions on the formation of aluminosilicate gel in geopolymers. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 41: 4550 - 4558.