By Ani, VC; Okpala, BC; Ofojebe, CJ; Ogelle, MO; Ogabido, CA (2023). Greener Journal of Medical Sciences, 13(2): 100-103.

Greener Journal of Medical Sciences Vol. 13(2), pp. 100-103, 2023 ISSN: 2276-7797 Copyright ©2023, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8138164 https://gjournals.org/GJMS

The Fetomaternal Outcome in Women that Had Caesarean Section in Northern Cross River State Nigeria.

Ani VC^1,2*, Okpala BC¹, Ofojebe CJ¹, Ogelle MO¹, and Ogabido CA¹

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.¹

Catholic Maternity Hospital, Ogoja, Cross River State, Nigeria.²

INTRODUCTION

Caesarean section is a lifesaving procedure for the baby, mother or both in the face of valid obstetric indications. (1)

The indications for caesarean section can be absolute or relative. The absolute indications include obstructed labour, major ante partum haemorrhage, malpresentation like oblique lie, transverse lie and brow presentation as well as uterine rupture. (2) The relative indications are fetal compromise, previous caesarean section, failure to progress in labour, breech presentation and pre/eclampsia. (2-8)

The rate of caesarean section varies in range, from 10.4% to 27.6% across Nigeria. (4-8) Rates from 31.60% to 38.16% have been noted in other parts of the globe. (1, 9)

Caesarean deliveries can be complicated in the mother by post partum haemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, damage to surrounding structures like bladder, ureter and small intestines. Others are wound dehiscence, endometritis, Asherman’s syndrome and secondary infertility. The baby may have lacerations to the scalp or face, shoulder dislocation, fracture to the clavicle or humerus and meconium aspiration. (2)

Caesarean section has been associated with more fetal and maternal morbidities and mortality compared with vaginal deliveries in spite of the increasing safety of anaesthesia and surgical techniques with caesarean deliveries. (10)

There is the need for us to evaluate the fetomaternal outcome in the caesarean deliveries conducted in this secondary health facility since most of the studies on caesarean section in Nigeria are from tertiary hospitals.

Aim

To determine the fetomaternal outcome among the women that had caesarean section at the Catholic Maternity Hospital, Ogoja, Cross River State Nigeria.

METHODOLOGY

The study is a retrospective one that reviewed the cases of 430 women that were surgically delivered at the Catholic Maternity Hospital, Ogoja in Northern Cross River state between 1^st January 2016 and 31^st December 2017.

The data was retrieved from their case files, birth register, theatre records and post natal ward records. The information obtained were age, parity, booking status, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, APGAR score as well as fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality.

The data analysis was done with the IBM’s Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 for windows. The data was presented as absolute numbers, means, standard deviation and frequency tables.

RESULTS

The age group of 26-30 years constituted the highest group of the women studied at 35.7%. Most of them were multiparous (73.2%) and majority of the caesarean sections performed were of the emergency type (82.3%). A greater part of them were booked (62.9%). The study showed that 86.2% of the babies had good APGAR score; 87.8% had normal birth weight while 12.2% had low birth weight. Still birth was noted in 10.1% of the babies delivered.

The values obtained from the sociodemographic characteristics and fetomaternal outcome are as shown in table 1 below.

Table 1: The sociodemographic characteristics and fetomaternal outcome

Table 2 shows the indications for caesarean section among the women that had still birth. Forty still births were recorded constituting 10.1% of the babies delivered. Most of them occurred in those with obstructed labour and fetal distress (30% each) while the least occurred in those with cord prolapse and retained second twin (2.5% each) as shown below.

Table 2: Indication for CS in patients that had still birth and the percentage.

The mean age of the women delivered surgically was 28.56 +/- 5.57 years and their mean gestational age at delivery was 38.63 +/- 1.34 weeks. The mean APGAR score of the babies was 7.74 +/- 5.20 while their mean birth weight was 3.12 +/- 0.6 kg. These were captured in table 3 below.

Table 3: The mean and range of the fetomaternal parameters

DISCUSSION

The caesarean section rate of 30.7% was noted from this study among the 430 women that had caesarean section out of 1402 women that delivered within the two year study period. Most of the patients studied were booked (62.9%) unlike in previous studies on caesarean section that showed a preponderance of unbooked patients. (3,11,12,13) They were however more emergency cases (82.3%) despite their booking status thus showing that they might have been avoiding caesarean section even while booked for elective cases. This is consistent with the strong aversion for caesarean section by women in our culture. (14) The high emergency cases noted were comparable to some other related studies. (3,11,12,13)

Among the babies delivered; 86.2% had good APGAR score of 7 and above, 87.8% had normal birth weight of 2.5kg and above while 12.2% had low birth weight. Still birth was recorded in 10.1% of the babies delivered. Other studies showed good fetomaternal outcome. (15,16)

Out of the 40 cases that had still birth, only 30% were booked while the greater part of them were unbooked (70%). Two of the babies were congenitally malformed with anencephaly and hydrocephalus. Maternal mortality was recorded in one of the women sectioned due to abruptio placentae that was complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulopathy.

The perinatal mortality rate associated with caesarean section among the women studied was 28.4/1000. This was less than 63.8/1000 noted by Ikeako et al but higher than 12.9/1000 recorded by Efetie et al.(16,17) The caesarean maternal mortality we noted was 71.32/100,000 which was far below 400/100,000 seen at Awka and 1180/100,000 found in a related study in Calabar, Nigeria.(16,18)

CONCLUSION

This caesarean section study with a rate of 30.7% had good fetomaternal outcome. There was a low CS associated perinatal mortality.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We acknowledge the staff of the Medical records department, theatre, Nurses and Midwives of the Labour and post natal wards for retrieving the patients’ data.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATION

This was obtained from the Institution’s review board.

RESEARCH FUNDING

No research grant was obtained for the study.

REFERENCES

1. Pravina P, Ranjana R and Goel N. Caesarean Audit Using Robson Classification at a tertiary Care Centre in Bihar: A Retrospective Study. Cureus 2022 Mar; 14 (3):e23133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23133.
2. Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A Bhatti R. Analysis of Caesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System. Pak J Med Sci 2021; 37 (2): 567-571.
3. Ugwu E, Ashioni A, Abubakar MY. Caesarean section and perinatal outcomes in a sub-urban tertiary hospital in North-West Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2015 May-June; 56 (3): 180-184.doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.160360.
4. Onoh RC, Eze JN, Ezeonu O, Lawani LO, Iyoke CA, Nkwo PO: A 10-year appraisal of Caesarean delivery and the associated fetal and maternal outcomes at a teaching hospital in Southeast Nigeria. Int, J Women’s Health. 2015; 7: 531-538.
5. Bukar M, Audu BM Massa AA. Caesarean delivery at the Federal Medical Centre Gombe: a 3-year experience. Nig J Med. 2009 Apr-Jun; 18 (2): 179-183.
6. Eleje GU, Udigwe GO, Akabuike JC, Eke AC, Eke NO, Umeobika JC. The Rate of Caesarean Section in Nnewi, Nigeria: A 10-year Review. Afrimedic Journal. 2010; 1 (1): 11-14.
7. Hilekan SKH, Ojabo A, Idogah S. Caesarean Section Rate in a Tertiary Hospital in Makurdi, North-Central Nigeria. General Med. 2015; 3:183.doi: 10.4172/2327.5146.1000183.
8. Ugwu EOV, Obioha KCE, Okezie OA, Ugwu AO. A five-year Survey of Caesarean Delivery at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2011; 1 (1): 77-83.
9. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021:6.
10. Attah RA, Zakari M, Haruna I. An audit of Caesarean section in a tertiary hospital northwest Nigeria. Trop J. Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 32 (2):
11. Geidam AD, Audu BM, Kawuwa BM, Obed JY. Rising trend and indications of caesarean section at University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2009; 8 (12): 127-132.
12. Igberase GO, Ebeigbe PN, Andrew BO, High caesarean section rate: a ten-year experience in a tertiary hospital in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Nig J Clin Pract 2009; 12: 294-297.
13. Oladapo OT, Sotunsa JO, SuleOdu AO. The rise in Caesarean birth rate in Sagamu Nigeria: reflection of changes in obstetric practice. Journal of Obs & Gynae 2004; 24 (4):377-381.
14. Chigbu CO, Iloabachie GC. The burden of caesarean section refusal in a developing country setting. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 114 (10): 1261-1265.
15. Dekker L, Houtzager T, Kilume O, Horogo J, Roosmalan J. V & Nyamtoma AS. Caesarean section audit to improve quality of care in a rural referral hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:164. doi: 10. 1186/s12284-018-1814-1.
16. Ikeako LC, Nwajiaku I, Ezegwui HU. Caesarean section in a Secondary health hospital in Awka, Nigeria. Nig Med J 2009; 50 (3):64-67.
17. Efetie RE, Umezulike AC, Agboghoroma CO. Caesarean section at the National Hospital Abuja 1999-2001, ANMINS, 2006; 3: 34-39.
18. Etuk SJ, Asuquo EES. Maternal mortality following caesarean section at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital Calabar, Nigeria. Niger J Med 1999; 8: 62-65.

PDF VIEWER

Loading...

Taking too long?

Reload document

| Open in new tab

Download [255.10 KB]