Okeke Et Al

Advertisements

Okeke et al

Greener
Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Vol.
9(2), pp. 155-162, 2019

ISSN:
2276-7770

Copyright
©2019, the copyright of this article is retained by the author(s)

DOI
Link:
http://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2019.2.032619050

http://gjournals.org/GJAS

 

 

 

Comparative
Analysis of the Technical Efficiency of Beneficiary and Non-Beneficiary Rice
Farmers of the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme in Benue State, Nigeria

 

 

*Okeke,
A.M1; Mbanasor, J.A2; Nto, P.O2

 

 

1Department of
Agribusiness, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.

2Department
of Agribusiness and Management, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture,
Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria.

 

  

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

 

Article No.: 03261950

Type: Research

DOI: 10.15580/GJAS.2019.2.032619050

 

 

Comparative
analysis of the technical efficiency of beneficiary and non-beneficiary rice
farmers of the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme in Benue State, Nigeria was
investigated. Data for the study were collected with the aid of
well-structured questionnaire from 768 rice farmers consisting of 388
beneficiaries and 380 non-beneficiaries from 18 communities and 18 Local
Government Areas using multi-stage sampling technique. The collected data
were analysed using descriptive statistics, multiple regression analysis,
and stochastic frontier production function. The findings revealed that the
beneficiary rice farmers achieved lower levels of technical efficiency
compared to the non-beneficiary rice farmers and that seed (0.483) and
agrochemical (1.60) used, increased technical efficiency more among
beneficiary rice farmers than the non-beneficiary rice farmers while
fertilizer (-1.285) used, decreased technical efficiency of beneficiary rice
farmers more compared to the non-beneficiary rice farmers. The results also
showed that rice production among the beneficiaries was in stage I of the
production curve and that gender (1.249), educational level (-0.045), age
(0.058), membership of cooperative (-0.250), extension visit (0.126),
marital status (-2.633), and household size (0.059) significantly influenced
their technical inefficiency. The study recommended policies and programmes
targeted at reallocation and redistribution of farm production inputs and
taking cognizance the incorporation of farmers’ socio-economic
characteristics in their formulation.

 

Submitted: 26/03/2019

Accepted:  28/03/2019

Published: 25/04/2019

 

*Corresponding Author

Okeke, A.M.

E-mail: anayomichaelokeke@
gmail.com

 

Keywords:

Technical
efficiency, Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, Rice farmers, Benue State, Nigeria

.

 

 

Return to Content       View [Full Article – PDF]  

[Full Article – HTML]              [Full Article – EPUB]

Post-Publication Peer-review Rundown

View/get involved, click [Peer-review]

 

REFERENCES

 

Ahmed, A., Xu, S., Yu, W. and Wang, Y.(2017).
Comparative Study on Factors Influencing Rice Yield in Niger State of Nigeria
and Hainan of China. International
Journal of Agricultural and Food Research (IJAFR)
, 6(1):15-25.

 

Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. (1988).
Production of Fano Level Technical Efficiency from a Generalized View. J. Econ., 38: 387-399.

 

Bivan, G.M., Akhilomen, L.O., Rahman, S.A.
and Sanni, S.A.(2015). Economic Efficiency analysis of Pineapple Production in
Edo State, Nigeria: A Stochastic Frontier Production Approach. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture,
5(3): 267-280.

 

BNARDA (2004). The  Impact of Benue State
Agricultural and Rural Development Authority
. Pp. 42.

 

Coelli, T.J. (1994). A Guide to FRONTIER
Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost
Function Estimation.
Department of Econometrics, University of New
England, Armidale, Australia.

 

Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS
NET) (2017). Nigeria Market Monitoring Bulletin. Pp 1-4.

 

Girei, A.A., Dire, B., Iliya, M.M. and
Salihu, M. (2013). Stochastic Frontier Production Function on the Resource Use
Efficiency of Fadama II Crop Farmers in Adamawa State, Nigeria. European Journal of Agricultural and
Forestry Research
, 1(2): 1-15

 

Gujarati, D. (1970). Use of Dummy Variables
in Testing for Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two linear Regressions:
A Note. American Statist, 230. Pp.
50-52.

 

Itam, K.O., Ajah, E.A., Ofem, U.I. and Abam,
O.E. (2015). Technical Efficiency Analysis of Small Scale Cassava Farmers in
Cross River State, Nigeria: A Stochastic Production Frontier Approach. Applied Economics and Finance, 2(4):
10-18

 

Maddala, G.S. (1988). Introduction to Economics. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York,
USA.

 

Nwaru, J.C. (2003). Gender and Relative
Production Efficiency in Food Crop Farming in Abia State of Nigeria. The Nigerian Agricultural Journal,
34:1-10.

 

Nwaru, J.C. and Iheke, O.R. (2010).
Comparative Analysis of Resource Use Efficiency in Rice Production Systems in
Abia State of Nigeria. Journal of
American Science
, 6(11): 396-408.

 

Ojehomon, V.E.T., Ayinde, O.E., Adewumi, M.O.
and Omotesho, O.A. (2013). Determinants of Technical Efficiency of New Rice for
Africa (NERICA) Production: A Gender Approach. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 6(5):
453-460.

 

Osanyinlusi, O.I. and Adenegan, K.O. (2016).
The Determinants of Rice Farmers’ Productivity in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences,
6(2): 49-58.

 

PwC Analysis (2017). Boosting Rice Production through Increased Mechanization.
PricewaterhouseCoopers Limited, Nigeria. Pp. 20.

 

Sankhayan, P.I. (1998). Introduction to Economics of Agricultural Production. Prentice
Hall, New Delhi, India. Pp. 35

 

Sibiko, K.W., Owuor, G., Birachi, E., Gido,
E.O., Ayuya, O.I. and Mwanyi, J.K. (2012). Analysis of Determinants of
Productivity and Technical Efficiency among Smallholder Common Bean Farmers in
Eastern Uganda. Current Research Journal
of Economic Theory
, 5(3): 44-55.

 

Cite this Article: Omovbude, S.;
Udom, BE; Udensi, UE (2019). Effects of Poultry Manure and Spent Mushroom
Substrate on Soil, Weed and Maize Performance in an Ultisol. Greener Journal
of Agricultural Sciences 9(2): 146-154,
http://doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2019.2.033119060.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *