Jagdish Et Al


Jagdish et al

Greener Journal of  Agricultural Sciences Vol. 4 (6), pp. 232-237, July 2014.

 ISSN: 2276-7770 

Research Paper

Manuscript Number: 011314034

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15580/GJAS.2014.6.011314034

Evaluation of some Bio- pesticides against some Important Lepidopteron Pests of Pigeonpea
(Cajanus cajan L.) at
Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India


Jaba Jagdish*, Meena Agnihotri
and Rakesh Sharma


Department of Entomology, GBPUAT, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.

*Corresponding Author’s Email: jaba.jagdish@ gmail. com


The field experiment
conducted to evaluate the relative efficacy of eight biopesticides against gram
pod borer  Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), legume pod borer, Marucavitrata (Geyer) and E.
infesting Pigenopea during Kharif season 2010. The population was recorded at different days after spraying of insecticides and it was found that the number of
larvae varied non- significantly different from the control in both spray application. Significant effect of
bio-pesticides on per cent webbing by M. vitrata,  at First spray application showed minimum
(32.00/25shoots) in 
NSKE 5.0 % @ 50
g/lit .The
pod borer M. vitrata was found lowest
in Spinosad 45%ww @73g.ai/ha (4.50%) , followed by NSKE 5 %  (4.81%) 
and B. bassiana DOR SC @
1.89gm/lit (5.39%) as compared to control (14.49%). The per cent
pod damage by H. armigera varied
significantly which was minimum (27.84%) in Spinosad 45%ww
@73g.ai/ha followed by B. bassiana WP
@ 1.5kg/ha (28.58%) and B. bassiana
DOR SC @ 1.89gm/lit (28.73%)  in
comparison to control (51.68%). Grain yield varied from maximum of 1200 kg/ha
in Spinosad 45%ww @73g.ai/ha followed by 1191.67 kg/ha in B. bassiana DOR SC @
1.89gm/lit as compared to 708.33kg/ha in untreated control.

Keywords: Bacillus thuringiensis, Beauveriabassiana, Helicoverpa armigera, insecticides,
Marucavitrata, NSKE 5%, microbials,
pigeonpea, spinosad.


(2007). The  medium  term 
plan. ICRISAT,  Patancheru  502324, 
Andhra Pradesh, India, 3.

Darmasena  SMD, Subasinghe  SMC, Lateef  SS, Menike S,  Saxena  KB and Ariyaratne  H.P.  (1992). In: 
Pigeonpea Varietal Adaptation 
and  production  studies 
in Sri  Lank,  Report 
of  Work.  Department 
of Agriculture,  Sri Lanka,  ICRISAT, 
Patancheru, Andhra  Pradesh,  India. 
Entomology  Research, 104-108 PP. 

Jeyarani S and  Karuppuchamy  P.  (2010).
Investigations  on  the 
enhancing  efficacy  of granulovirus  on 
nucleopolyhedrovirus  of
Helicoverpa  armigera  (Hubner). 
Journal  ofBiopesticides, 3(1):

Mittal  V and  Ujagir  R  (2005).  Evaluation 
of naturaly tespinosad against pod borer complex
in  early 
pigeonpea.  Indian  Journal 
of  Plant Protection, 33(2):

Rao GVR, Kumari PRA, Rao VR and Reddy YVR (2007). Evaluation of  spinosad and  indoxacarbfor 
the management of  legume pod  borer,Marucavitrata  (Geyer) 
in Pigeonpea.  Journal  of 
food  legumes,20(1): 126-127.

Saxena  KB,  Chandrasena  GDSN,
Hettiarachchi K,  Iqbal YB,
Fonseka HHD and Jayasekara SJBA (2002).Evaluation of pigeon pea
accessions and selected  lines  for reaction to Maruca. Crop Science, 42: 615-618.

Sreekanth M and Seshamahalakshmi  M (2012). Studies  on 
relative  toxicity  of 
biopesticides  to  Helicoverpa  armigera(Hubner) and Marucavitrata (Geyer) on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) Journal  of
Biopesticides. 5(2): 191-195.

Shanower  TG, 
Romeis J  and  Minja EM (1999). Insect  pests  of 
pigeonpea  and  their management.  Annual 
Review  of  Entomology, 44: 77-96

Sharma HC  (1998).
 Bionomics,  host 
plant resistance  and  management 
of  legume  pod borer, 
Marucavitrata  – 
a  review.  Crop Protection, 17: 373-386.

Yadav GS,  and Dahiya B (2004).
Evaluation  of new  insecticides/ 
chemicals  against  pod 
borer and  pod  fly  on
 pigeonpea.  Annals of Biology, 20(1): 55-56.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.