Induce genetic variability in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Tissue Culture condition

Advertisements

By Hassan, KO; Ajayi, AT; Anukwu, BC; Ajongbolo, FB; Lawyer, EF; Ilesanmi, AO; Afolayan, AO (2024). Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(3): 153-157.

 

Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences

ISSN: 2276-7770

Vol. 14(3), pp. 153-157, 2024

Copyright ©2024, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

https://gjournals.org/GJAS

Article’s title & authors

Induce genetic variability in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Tissue Culture condition

Hassan, K.O.1*; Ajayi, A.T.2; Anukwu, B.C. 1; Ajongbolo, F.B.1; Lawyer, E.F.1; Ilesanmi, A.O.1; Afolayan, A.O.1

1Department of Tissue Culture, National Centre for Genetic Resource and Biotechnology (NACRAB), Moor Plantation, Ibadan, National Biotechnology Research and Development Agency, (NBRDA) Nigeria.

2Department of Plant Science and Biotechnology, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo state, Nigeria.

ARTICLE INFO

ABSTRACT

Article No.: 082224105

Type: Research

Full Text: PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB. MP3

This study investigated the induction of genetic variability in rice through tissue culture techniques using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Two rice accessions underwent varying soak durations (12 and 24 hours) and concentrations (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% H2O2). Following soaking, the seeds were inoculated into Murashige and Skoog (MS) media in a completely randomized design with three replications under in vitro conditions. Phenotypic traits, including the number of shoots, shoot length, number of roots, and root length, were analyzed through ANOVA with a significance threshold of ≤ 0.05. Results indicated significant differences among the treated plantlets and the control group, with specific treatments demonstrating superior performance in various physical parameters. Notably, the highest mean number of shoots (2.06) was observed in the control group (12 hours) for accession NGB00789, followed by 2.00 in the control group (12 hours) for NGB00792. Conversely, the lowest mean value (0.17) was recorded for NGB00792 soaked with 100% H2O2 for 12 hours. Regarding shoot length, NGB00789 soaked with 100% H2O2 for 12 hours exhibited the highest mean value (4.44 cm), while NGB00792 soaked with 60% H2O2 for 24 hours reached a mean value of 4.36 cm. For the number of roots, the highest mean value (6.67) was observed in NGB00789 under the control condition, followed by 6.22 in NGB00792, also in the control group. The lowest mean value (0.56) was recorded in NGB00792 soaked with 100% H2O2 for 12 hours. Concerning root length, the highest mean value (6.01 cm) was achieved in NGB00792 treated with 60% H2O2 for 24 hours, while NGB00792 soaked with 20% H2O2 for 12 hours reached a mean value of 5.99 cm. The lowest mean value (0.32 cm) was recorded in NGB00789 treated with 80% H2O2 for 24 hours. In conclusion, this study not only sheds light on the practical applications of hydrogen peroxide in rice tissue culture but also underscores the necessity for further research in this domain to fully harness the potential of mutagenesis as a tool for crop improvement.

Accepted: 23/08/2024

Published: 09/09/2024

*Corresponding Author

K.O. Hassan

E-mail: hassanoluwafemi689@ yahoo.com

Keywords: Mutagenesis, Crop improvement, genetic variability, hydrogen peroxide, rice, tissue culture
   

INTRODUCTION

Rice (Oryza sativa L.), a staple crop worldwide, possesses untapped genetic potential for significantly higher grain yields in various rice-growing ecosystems. However, realizing this potential remains a challenge, primarily due to the crop’s sensitivity to abiotic stresses, with salinity being a prominent stressor (Grover et al., 2000). In Nigeria, rice cultivation, largely led by smallholder farmers utilizing traditional methods, constitutes over 80% of the national production (Omoare and Oyediran, 2020). Despite being the top rice producer in Africa, challenges such as outdated technology, low productivity, and inadequate infrastructure hinder sustainable production (Afiukwa, 2016; Rosenzweig et al., 2001). Abiotic stresses, including salt toxicity, drought, and nutrient deficiency, present significant threats to rice production in Nigeria (Umego et al., 2020). The impact of drought stress, affecting approximately 23 million hectares of rain-fed rice globally, is expected to exacerbate with climate change (Serraj et al., 2011; Ahmad et al., 2020).

To mitigate these challenges, it is essential to develop effective strategies to protect rice production from the adverse effects of abiotic stresses. A cost-effective approach for enhancing crop species resilience against production challenges involves employing chemical mutagenesis. While various chemicals have been utilized for inducing mutagenesis in crop species, the potential of hydrogen peroxide in this context remains largely unexplored.

Hydrogen peroxide functions as a mutagen in plant breeding experiments, fostering genetic variability for diverse traits in crops such as cowpea, mung bean, and sesame (Susrama et al., 2022; Ablaku et al., 2021). It is also implicated in various gene expressions, DNA damage, and programmed cell death across plant species. In Arabidopsis thaliana, hydrogen peroxide treatment induced significant changes in gene expression patterns related to light signaling, nutrient status, and temperature, highlighting its role in regulating cellular processes. Studies, exemplified by Takáč et al. (2016), reveal that hydrogen peroxide positively influences flax adventitious root formation by regulating auxin levels, suggesting its potential application for enhancing flax regeneration capacity. While hydrogen peroxide is extensively used in various plant studies, specific experiments on its role in inducing genetic variability in rice are limited, with most rice research concentrating on its response to oxidative stress and the activation of defense mechanisms.

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of hydrogen peroxide for inducing genetic variability in rice under tissue culture conditions. It sets the stage for a comprehensive examination of the mutagenic effects of hydrogen peroxide and its implications for rice genetic diversity and agronomic traits.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant materials

Seeds from two rice accessions, namely NGB 00789 and NGB 00792, recognized for their upland characteristics and higher yield potential, were obtained from the Seed GeneBank Department at the National Centre for Genetic Resource and Biotechnology (NACGRAB) in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Seed surface preparation

Healthy seeds underwent a thorough cleaning process, involving washing with a 0.02% (v/v) tween-20 solution, followed by rinsing under running tap water. Surface sterilization was carried out by immersing seeds in 0.15% (v/v) NaOCl2 for 10 minutes, followed by subsequent treatment with 70% (v/v) ethanol for 5 minutes. These steps were performed under aseptic conditions within a laminar airflow chamber. Sterilized seeds were meticulously rinsed with sterile distilled water five times and then air-dried on sterile filter sheets within 90 mm Petri dishes.

Inoculation and culture

Upon surface sterilization, seeds were introduced onto fresh culture media composed of Murashige and Skoog (MS) salts and vitamins (Murashige and Skoog, 1962). These sterilized seeds underwent treatment with varying concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) — 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% — for different durations: control (untreated), 12 hours, and 24 hours. After treatment, the seeds were meticulously washed with sterile water before placement on the prepared MS media. To ensure sterility, the media’s pH was adjusted to 5.80 using 0.1 N HCl or NaOH, followed by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 minutes. Cultures were then maintained under controlled conditions in a growth room, featuring a temperature of 27 ± 2°C, a photoperiod of 16 hours of light (at an intensity of 10,000 lux), and 8 hours of darkness.

Experimental design

The research study was carried out using experimental design a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications under in vitro conditions. It is important to note that the number of seeds or samples per replication was [insert specific number], and randomization procedures were employed during the experiment.

Data collection and analysis

After two weeks of inoculation, various physical parameters were assessed to monitor the growth and development of the cultures. Regeneration frequency, denoting the number of surviving plantlets resulting from H2O2 treatment, was determined. Data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using AGRES software, employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess the impact of H2O2 on mutagenesis induction and regeneration.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The study aimed to induce genetic variation in rice under tissue culture conditions using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) as a chemical mutagen. The impact of H2O2 treatment on desirable phenotypic traits, including the number of shoots, shoot length, number of roots, and root length, was evaluated. The experiment focused on the direct regeneration of plants through embryogenesis in Murashige and Skoog (MS) media treated with H2O2. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to assess the significance of observed variations, with significant levels determined at a probability threshold of ≤ 0.05 (Table 1).

Effect of H2O2 treatment on phenotypic traits

A notable decrease in all assessed traits was observed with increasing duration of mutagenic treatments, both for the 12-hour and 24-hour treatments with full-strength MS media (Table 2). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were identified among the treated plantlets and the control group. Certain treatments performed better in terms of physical parameters. The number of shoots showed the highest mean value (2.06) in the control group (12 hours) for rice accession NGB00789, followed by a mean value of 2.00 in the control group (12 hours) for NGB00792. In contrast, the lowest mean value (0.17) was recorded for NGB00792 soaked with 100% H2O2 for 12 hours. For shoot length, the highest mean value (4.44 cm) was achieved in NGB00789 soaked with 100% H2O2 for 12 hours, while NGB00792 soaked with 60% H2O2 for 24 hours reached a mean value of 4.36 cm. Regarding the number of roots, the highest mean value (6.67) was observed in NGB00789 without H2O2 treatment (control), followed by a mean value of 6.22 in NGB00792, also in the control group. The lowest mean value (0.56) was recorded in NGB00792 soaked with 100% H2O2 for 12 hours. The highest mean value (6.01 cm) for root length was achieved in NGB00792 treated with 60% H2O2 for 24 hours, while a mean value of 5.99 cm was observed in NGB00792 soaked with 20% H2O2 for 12 hours. The lowest mean value (0.32 cm) was recorded in NGB00789 treated with 80% H2O2 for 24 hours.

Table 1: Analysis of variance of H2O2-induced phenotypic traits in rice under tissue culture conditions
Source of variation DF SHTN SHTL RTN RTL
Treatment 5 0.018* 0.024* 0.039* 0.041*
Hr 1 1ns 0.063ns 0.161ns 0.234ns
Treatment × Hr 5 0.021* 0.027* 0.072ns 0.078ns
Error 24        

Probability of significant level when p ≤ 0.05

NS: Number of shoots; SL: Shoot length; NR: Number of roots; RL: Root length

 

Table 2: Mean and standard deviation of H2O2-induced phenotypic traits in rice under tissue culture conditions

Treatment Number of shoots Shoot length (cm) Number of roots Root length (cm)
H202 20% (12hr) NGB 00789 1.33 ± 0.97bc 3.28 ± 2.56abc 4.72 ± 3.71bcd 3.21 ± 2.44def
H202 40% (12hr) 1.11 ± 0.90cde 3.07 ± 2.54bc 4.06±3.54cdef 4.17±3.05bcd
H202 60% (12hr) 0.00±0.00h 0.00±0.00h 0.00±0.00j 0.00±0.00i
H202 80% (12hr) 0.67±0.97defg 1.54±2.25def 2.50±3.84efgh 1.79±2.61fgh
H202100% (12hr) 1.72±0.57ab 4.44±2.07a 5.17±2.09abcd 3.38±1.59de
CONTROL (12h) 2.06±0.54a 3.38±1.27abc 6.67±3.41a 5.62±1.62ab
H202 20% (24hr) 1.06±0.94cdef 1.31±1.14efg 2.28±2.22fghi 1.19±1.06ghi
H202 40% (24hr) 1.89±0.32a 3.54±1.45abc 5.67±1.61abc 4.43±1.38bcd
H202 60% (24hr) 1.67±1.28ab 2.34±1.77cde 4.28±3.18cde 3.83±3.12bcd
H202 80% (24hr)

0.33±0.49gh

0.70±1.02fgh 0.67±0.97hij 0.32±0.49hi
H202100% (24hr) 0.00±0.00h 0.00±0.00h 0.00±0.00j 0.00±0.00i
CONTROL (24hr) 1.83±0.38ab 2.28±0.24cde 3.67±1.81def 3.11±1.43def
H202 20% (12hr) NGB 00792 1.83±0.38ab 3.24±1.29abc 5.17±2.43abcd 5.81±2.10a
H202 40% (12hr) 0.67±0.97defg 1.44±1.67efgh 1.11±1.67ghij 2.21±3.11fgh
H202 60% (12hr)

1.17±0.99cd

2.55±2.33cd 2.78±2.51efg 3.09±2.75def
H202 80% (12hr) 0.61±0.91efg 1.33±2.15efg 1.39±2.19ghij 1.93±3.01efg
H202100% (12hr) 0.17±0.38gh 0.08±0.19h 0.56±1.29ij 0.68±1.57ghi
CONTROL (12h) 2.00±0.00a 2.96±1.59bc 6.22±2.69ab 5.53±2.03ab
H202 20% (24hr) 1.78±0.65ab 2.73±1.39bc 5.44±2.66abcd 5.99±2.24a
H202 40% (24hr) 1.72±0.67ab

3.84±1.75ab

4.94±2.53abcd 4.63±2.19abcd
H202 60% (24hr) 1.89±0.32a 4.36±1.96a 5.56±2.97abcd 6.01±2.18a
H202 80% (24hr) 0.56±0.92fg 1.13±1.87efgh 1.83±3.19ghij 0.99±1.66ghi
H202100% (24hr) 0.22±0.55gh 0.14±0.35gh 0.67±1.64hij 0.69±1.59ghi
CONTROL (24hr) 1.94±0.23a 3.27±1.56abc 5.39±2.30abcd 4.97±2.07abc

DISCUSSION

Mutation induction has been recorded for a long period. Nevertheless, many improvements have been made to increase the mutation frequency from modern technology. Rice is an important cereal crop species for economic values and value addition chain globally, and since it presents a small genome and displays synteny with other crops, many achievements in rice structural and functional genomics have been expanded to other crop species. Rice was already objective from the initial findings of mutation induction of recent research work, which includes more than the 9th century of research. Much has been gained agronomically and conservatively through the increase in rice variability. Chemical mutagenesis offers several advantages, including ease of handling, cost-effectiveness, and specificity compared to physical mutagenesis methods. However, it is crucial to exercise caution due to the potentially carcinogenic nature of chemical mutagens. Research in crop mutagenesis has demonstrated the superiority of chemical mutagens over ionizing radiations, as they induce milder genetic effects and fewer chromosome breaks. Rapoport (1966) made significant contributions to the field by introducing the concept of “microgenetics.” This concept elucidates gene structure, function, mutagen mode of action, mutation origin, and fixation in progeny.

This review summarized the data related to the role of hydrogen peroxide that we have published during the past 15 years using rice (cultivar TN1) as a model plant. It is clear that, in rice plants, hydrogen peroxide not only acts as a toxic compound but also as a signaling molecule associated with basal salt media. In considering the relationships between hydrogen peroxide production and basal salt media and response to mutation, we would also remember that these stresses almost occur in the field together with other abiotic stress conditions. Such combinations could include phenotypic and temperature factors. How these different stress combinations affect hydrogen peroxide production and basal salt media is a subject of active research that should be taken into reward. Chloroplasts are one of rice cells’ most significant sources of hydrogen peroxide. Extensive insight mutagens play an important role in cereal crops especially rice by using hydrogen peroxide in signaling seems to be necessary. However, it would be a great admire and demand to notify all the changes in gene expression regulated by phenotypic expression or abiotic stresses in rice using transcriptomic analyses. The combined use of mutagenic treatment with in vitro culture was applied to play the role of alteration in genetic variations. This was delineated by best growth value and green plant regeneration frequency of irradiated Hydrogen peroxide-adapted affected chlorophyll content of the plant and some formed callus induction as compared with non -non-mutagenized control shown in (Tables 1 and 2). Some results were recorded by other authors (Bhagwat and Duncan, 1998; Cheema, et al., 2002; Lee, et al., 2003). It was believed that minimal stress or proper stress on the callus by irradiation might not induce irreversible genotypic changes but could stimulate chlorophyll pigmentation reduction or callus formation and plant regeneration. Furthermore, the haploid induction technique can nowadays be efficiently combined with several other plant biotechnological techniques, enabling several novel breeding achievements, such as hybrid breeding, improved mutation breeding, reverse breeding, and genetic transformation.

REFERENCES

Ablaku AB, Abimiku, SE, Ablaku BE (2021) Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide and Benzene Treatments on Morphological Traits of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Journal of Food Technology & Nutrition Sciences. SRC/JFTNS/140. DOI: doi.org/10.47363/JFTNS/2021(3)126

Adesina, E; Adeloye, D; Falola, H; Adeyeye, B; Yartey, D; Kayode-Adedeji, T (2020). Health Communication and Behavioural Practice towards Ending Hepatitis B Virus in Southwest Nigeria. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4969687.

Afiukwa, C.A., Faluyi, J.O., Atkinson, C.J., Ubi, B.E., Igwe, D.O. and Akinwale, R.O. (2016) Screening of Some Rice Varieties and Landraces Cultivated in Nigeria for Drought Tolerance Based on Phenotypic Traits and Their Association with SSR Polymorphism. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 2599-2615. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11239

Ahmed, I., Ahmad, M., Khan, F. A., & Asif, M. (2020). Comparison of deep-learning-based segmentation models: Using top view person images. IEEE Access, 8, 136361.

Bhagwat, B., Duncan, E (1998). Mutation breeding of Highgate (Musa acuminata, AAA) for tolerance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense using gamma irradiation. Euphytica 101, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018391619986.

Cheema, Z.A., Khaliq, A. and Ali, K. (2002) Efficacy of sorgaab for weed control in wheat grown at different fertility levels. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res. 8, 33–38.

EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms), 

Grover, JK; Vats, V; Rathi, SS (2000). Anti-hyperglycemic effect of Eugenia jambolana and Tinospora cordifolia in experimental diabetes and their effects on key metabolic enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 73(3), 461-470

Lee, M. R. F. ; Harris, L. J. ; Dewhurst, R. J. ; Merry, R. J. ; Scollan, N. D., 2003. The effect of clover silages on long chain fatty acid rumen transformations and digestion in beef steers. Anim. Sci., 76: 491-501

Oyediran, WO; Omoare, AM; Shobowale, AA; Onabajo, AO (2020). Effect of socio-economic characteristics of greenhouse farmers on vegetable production in Ogun state, Nigeria. Sustainability, Agri, Food and Environmental Research, 8(1), 2020: 76-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.7770/safer-V0N0-art1593

Rapoport, A. (1966). A study of a multistage decision-making task with an unknown duration. Human Factors, 8(1), 54–61.

Rosenzweig, C.I.R., C., K. Boote, S. Hollinger, A. Iglesias, and J. Phillips., Impacts of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation on agriculture: Guidelines for regional analysis in Impacts of El Niño and Climate Variability on agriculture, A.S.o. Agronomy, Editor. 2001: Madison, WI. p. 21–30.

Serraj, R; McNally, KL; Slamet-Loedin, I; Kohli, A; Haefele, SM; Atlin, G; Kumar, A (2011). Drought Resistance Improvement in Rice: An Integrated Genetic and Resource Management Strategy. Plant Production Science Volume 14(1).

Susrama, I.G., Putra, A.H., & Ariefwan, M. (2022). Feature Extraction for Face Recognition Using Haar Cascade Classifier. International Seminar of Research Month 2021, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.11594/nstp.2022.2432.

Takáč T. & Šamaj J. (2016) Advantages and limitations of shot-gun proteomic analyses on Arabidopsis plants with altered MAPK signaling. Plant Proteomics 6, 107. 

.

Cite this Article:

Hassan, KO; Ajayi, AT; Anukwu, BC; Ajongbolo, FB; Lawyer, EF; Ilesanmi, AO; Afolayan, AO (2024). Induce genetic variability in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Tissue Culture condition. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(3): 153-157.

PDF VIEWER

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [324.88 KB]

.

 

Loading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

× Chat on Whatsapp?