Return to Issue
Full text – PDF
Full text – HTM
Full text – EPUB
Table of Contents
Greener Journal of Social Sciences
Vol. 14(2), pp. 175-186, 2024
ISSN: 2276-7800
Copyright ©2024, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
https://gjournals.org/GJSC
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2024.2.102024136
Africa International University, Karen, Nairobi, Kenya.
Full Text: PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB, MP3
DOI: 10.15580/gjss.2024.2.102024136
Accepted: 20/10/2024
Published: 26/10/2024
John Philip Sele
E-mail: seleswop@gmail.com; markmukundi05@gmail.com
A critical component of every country’s growth path is the relationship between economic empowerment and education, especially about young employment. The foundation for providing young people with the abilities, know-how, and skills necessary for long-term economic engagement is education. To what degree, however, education leads to economic empowerment is contingent upon the political policies that oversee the education system. Through their policies, governments influence the standard, reachability, and applicability of educational programs, which in turn impacts young people’s capacity to find work and make significant contributions to their countries’ economy. According to Sele and Wanjiku (2024), political and socioeconomic hurdles frequently limit the efficacy of education, which is a major driver of economic growth. Globally, young unemployment is rising because of the mismatch between education systems and labour market needs, which is made worse by insufficient policies (UNESCO, 2020; Smith, 2023).
Education systems’ inclusion and quality are greatly impacted by political agendas. For example, in nations like Kenya and Nigeria, efforts like technical and vocational education and training (TVET) programs have been implemented to match educational outputs with the demands of the labour market. However, as Sele and Wanjiku (2024) contend, these initiatives need to be a part of a more comprehensive, well-coordinated political plan that deals with the underlying issues that contribute to young unemployment, such as inequality and poverty. Education systems fail to economically empower young people in the absence of such comprehensive interventions, which feeds the cycle of underemployment and unemployment (World Bank, 2021; Johnson & Lopez, 2022).
Furthermore, because of technological breakthroughs, the world economy is rapidly changing, necessitating the need for new skill sets in the workforce. The issue of young employment is now made more difficult by the fact that traditional educational models are becoming more and more out of sync with the demands of the labor market. According to Johnson and Lopez (2022), one of the main causes of the growing unemployment rates, especially for young people, is the mismatch between education and the demands of the labor market. Therefore, changes that increase education systems’ adaptability to the changing needs of the global economy must be given top priority by political leaders (World Economic Forum, 2022; ILO, 2021).
Beyond matching educational requirements to economic demands, political measures are essential to guarantee fair access to education, particularly for underprivileged and marginalized people. Youth from low-income families are disproportionately kept out of high-quality education in many developing nations, which results in uneven job possibilities (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). Inadequate financing, corruption, and ineffective governance structures that disregard the importance of inclusive education policies exacerbate this problem. To close the inequality gap, governments must fund high-quality education systems that are available to everyone, regardless of socioeconomic status, according to the World Bank (2021).
Policy changes in sub-Saharan Africa, where young unemployment rates are still among the highest in the world, must involve more than just expanding access to education. Poverty and inequality, as Sele and Wanjiku (2024) point out, are systemic problems that call for a multipronged strategy that includes not just education but also social safety nets and economic changes to assist young people when they enter labour. The region’s youth employment results have stagnated in part due to a lack of sufficient political will to solve these structural problems (OECD, 2020; UNDP, 2019).
Furthermore, to guarantee that education results in worthwhile employment opportunities, international organizations like the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and UNESCO have called for stronger policy frameworks that integrate education and skills development with employment policies (ILO, 2021; UNESCO, 2020). Public-private collaborations have become a critical tactic in this setting for enhancing youth employability. To ensure that young graduates have relevant, marketable skills, governments must collaborate closely with the corporate sector to connect education curricula with industry demands (World Economic Forum, 2022; Global Partnership for Education, 2019). These kinds of partnerships are crucial to closing the skills gap that still exists in many industrialized and developing nations.
There has never been a more pressing need for adaptable and responsive educational institutions as globalization continues to alter labour markets. In addition to raising educational standards, political measures should be created to make the transfer from school to the workplace easier. This entails developing conditions that are favourable to the development of jobs, encouraging entrepreneurship, and assisting youth in showcasing their innovative ideas (Smith, 2023; UNDP, 2019). The ability of political institutions to adjust to global economic changes and provide youngsters with the tools they need to succeed ultimately rests on their ability to implement focused economic and educational reforms.
The article will critically analyze how political policies affect economic empowerment and education, with a particular emphasis on how these policies will affect young employment in the future. Based on case studies from Kenya, Nigeria, and other areas, this article will examine the advantages and disadvantages of several policy measures that try to lower young unemployment. Additionally, it will look at how legislators may create more youth-focused, equitable policies that promote long-term job outcomes and fair economic growth.
The Link Between Education and Economic Empowerment
The relationship between education and economic empowerment is intimately linked to the role that political policies will have in determining young employment in the future. Political frameworks, as was previously said, influence the course of national education systems and, therefore, how employable young people are. To provide routes to economic empowerment, policies that invest in high-quality education, skill development, and vocational training are essential. By matching educational requirements with labour market needs, these programs tackle the urgent problems of youth unemployment and underemployment (ILO, 2021; UNESCO, 2020).
But education is more than simply a way to provide young people with employment skills; it is also a driving force behind greater economic expansion and social change. Prioritizing fair access to education in political policy creates the foundation for an inclusive economy that allows more people to engage in meaningful labour market participation. On the other hand, the economic potential of the youth population is compromised when education systems are disregarded or badly designed, increasing marginalization, poverty, and inequality (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
In this regard, the next section explores how education functions as a potent catalyst for economic emancipation. We may better understand the crucial relationship between education, political decisions, and young employment by investigating how education encourages innovation, gets people ready for the workforce, and either maintains or reduces inequality. The significance of education as the cornerstone around which political policies should be constructed to guarantee sustainable development and economic empowerment for the coming generation is emphasized by this analysis.
Education as a Catalyst for Economic Growth
Because it promotes critical thinking, creativity, and entrepreneurship—all necessary for creating robust and productive economies—education is a key factor in economic progress. People may handle difficult problems in the workplace by learning problem-solving techniques in addition to technical knowledge through schooling. Sele and Wanjiku (2024) contend that economic growth is based on education, especially in low- and middle-income nations where human capital is frequently underutilized because of insufficient training programs. The authors also stress how education creates a trained labour force that can operate in both established and growing industries, which raises a country’s total economic production. Empirical research demonstrating a robust relationship between GDP growth and education levels lends credence to this (World Bank, 2021; OECD, 2020).
Education not only encourages creativity but also makes it easier for entrepreneurial endeavours to expand, which is essential for economic empowerment. Formal education provides entrepreneurs with the information and skills necessary to recognize market possibilities, mitigate business risks, and grow their enterprises. For example, nations that place a strong priority on entrepreneurship education typically have better rates of innovation and employment creation (Smith, 2023). However, the influence of education on entrepreneurship varies from nation to nation; it is contingent upon how well government policies connect academic goals with business objectives (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). To ensure that education reaches its full potential as a catalyst for economic growth and empowerment, political commitment to educational reform is essential (ILO, 2021; UNESCO, 2020).
Skills Development and Job Market Requirements
Many regions of the world continue to struggle with the mismatch between educational attainment and labour market demands, especially South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, where rates of young unemployment remain startlingly high (OECD, 2020; World Economic Forum, 2022). By giving youth the skills, they need to fulfil the needs of the labour market today and in the future, a well-designed, skills-based education system may contribute to the solution of this problem. According to Sele and Wanjiku (2024), a relevant education system must emphasize practical skills that are in line with industrial demands in addition to academic knowledge. To educate young people about a dynamic and changing labor market, they emphasize in their comparative analysis of Nigeria and Kenya the significance of incorporating technical and vocational education and training (TVET) into the national curriculum.
New skill sets like data analytics, programming, and critical thinking are becoming more and more necessary for employability as businesses shift towards automation and digitalization (Johnson & Lopez, 2022). A generation of educated but unemployed youth is the unfortunate effect of many education systems in developing nations continuing to rely on antiquated curricula that ignore the skills gap. This disparity highlights the necessity of governmental programs that prioritize lifelong learning and ongoing skill development, particularly in industries where technology is advancing quickly (World Bank, 2021; ILO, 2021). To guarantee that educational institutions generate graduates with the skills required by the business sector, public-private collaborations can also be extremely important (Global Partnership for Education, 2019; Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
Education Inequality and Economic Disparity
The economic disparity between various socioeconomic groups is made worse by the uneven distribution of educational possibilities. In many developing nations, access to decent education is typically influenced by financial class, geographic location, and gender, which creates a substantial divide between the privileged and the disadvantaged (UNDP, 2019; Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). People with access to top-notch education are more likely to land lucrative careers and amass money, while those without it are frequently stuck in low-paying, precarious occupations. Due to the elite’s continued dominance over important economic sectors, most of the people lives in poverty as a direct result of this unequal access to education (World Bank, 2021; UNESCO, 2020).
Furthermore, this cycle of economic inequality is sustained by government measures that do not address educational differences. Sele and Wanjiku (2024) emphasize the significance of inclusive education policies that provide equitable access to education for all individuals, irrespective of their socioeconomic status. This is especially important in urban slums, where children are more likely to drop out of school owing to financial challenges, and in rural regions, where educational infrastructure is frequently undeveloped. To guarantee that marginalized groups are not left behind, addressing these discrepancies needs specific interventions, such as affirmative action programs and greater investment in rural education systems (UNESCO, 2020; Smith, 2023).
One important factor in lowering educational disparity is political will. The OECD (2020) states that governments should give priority to financing for underprivileged areas, guarantee gender equity in education, and enact laws that remove obstacles to educational access. In the absence of such initiatives, the gap between the affluent and the impoverished over access to high-quality education would only deepen, exacerbating economic inequality and impeding global economic expansion (World Economic Forum, 2022).
Examining how political policies shape these processes is essential to comprehending the strong correlation between economic empowerment and education. Even while education is essential for both individual and societal economic growth, the effectiveness of educational programs and job prospects is either enabled or constrained by the framework of political policy. Education provides people with the information, abilities, and critical thinking required for innovation and economic progress, as was covered in the section before this one (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). However, political actions that affect educational quality, accessibility, and relevance to the labour market have a significant impact on how much education contributes to economic empowerment.
Political policies influence educational institutions’ form and content as well as the routes that lead from education to work, especially in developing countries like Nigeria and Kenya (Hanushek & Woessmann, 2020). How education translates into job preparedness, young entrepreneurship, and sustainable employment is directly impacted by policies about financing, curriculum design, and skills development. Furthermore, whether issues like inequality and economic disparity hinder educational achievements depends critically on political stability and governance frameworks (World Bank, 2020). Therefore, a thorough understanding of the relationship between education and economic empowerment requires an examination of political policy.
We will examine the critical role that political policies play in determining educational systems and job outcomes in the next section, with a focus on their impact on young employment and economic inequality.
Policy Influence on Education Systems
Education systems are significantly shaped by political policies, which have an impact on everything from curriculum development to fairness and access. The priority within educational reforms, the organisation of educational systems, and the amount of funds allotted to education are all determined by government policies (UNESCO, 2020). Government spending on education has changed throughout time in nations like Kenya and Nigeria, which influences accessibility and quality of education, particularly for underprivileged populations (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). Studies show that nations with higher levels of education investment—both in terms of public spending and policy emphasis—generally have more educated populations and, as a result, stronger economies (Hanushek & Woessmann, 2020).
Furthermore, policies pertaining to the development of infrastructure, the training of teachers, and the integration of technology in schools directly affect the quality of education. Political leaders that view education as a critical component of national development frequently put policies into place that promote sustained socioeconomic progress by guaranteeing that the next generation of workers has the skills needed to prosper in the labour market (World Bank, 2020). On the other hand, undervaluing education might result in a workforce with inadequate education, which would reduce a country’s economic opportunities and increase inequality (Schwab, 2019).
Employment Legislation and Youth Unemployment
The rising problem of youth unemployment requires the implementation of employment policies, especially those about youth employment. In many developing nations, where school systems frequently fall short of providing pupils with the skills required for the modern labor market, youth unemployment is still a serious problem (ILO, 2021). Political interventions may close the skills gap between education and employment by creating channels for young people to enter the workforce through job creation programs, youth entrepreneurship initiatives, and favorable employment legislation (McGrath & Powell, 2020).
A mismatch between the skills provided in schools and the needs of the labor market has made young unemployment worse in both Nigeria and Kenya (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). This discrepancy highlights the significance of legislative initiatives that prioritize vocational training and skills-based education to prepare youth for the workforce. Furthermore, measures that assist the unorganized sector of the economy, which employs a large percentage of the youth labor population, can aid in the formalization of employment and offer more stable job possibilities (UNESCO, 2020).
The Impact of Political Instability on Education and Employment
Employment and education can be severely impacted by political unrest. Education systems sometimes fail first in areas afflicted by violence or political turmoil, robbing young people of the chance to acquire and gain the skills they need for future employment (UNICEF, 2021). Furthermore, economic downturns brought on by political unrest can worsen unemployment, especially for young people, by lowering job prospects. (Ozturk, 2018).
For example, the continuous fighting in Nigeria’s northeast has seriously damaged the country’s educational systems, resulting in high dropout rates and restricted access to high-quality education (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). In a similar vein, political turmoil in Kenya after elections has been connected to disturbances in the fields of employment and education, underscoring the necessity of stable political contexts to guarantee that youth have access to both meaningful job and education (World Bank, 2020).
Conversely, political stability creates the conditions for successful educational institutions and the creation of job possibilities. The crucial connection between politics, education, and economic empowerment is further supported by the fact that nations that invest in political stability through governance reforms and conflict resolution initiatives typically have better educational outcomes and lower rates of youth unemployment (Hanushek & Woessmann, 2020).
The employment opportunities available to young people are significantly shaped by economic policy. The decisions made regarding youth-oriented initiatives, labour laws, and reactions to globalization have a direct impact on the development of young job prospects. With an emphasis on entrepreneurship, labour market rules, and the global economy, this section examines how governments employ political and economic frameworks to encourage the development of jobs for young people.
Governments frequently use youth-targeted economic measures, such as grants, entrepreneurial funds, and tax incentives, to combat young unemployment. To guarantee that young people have access to the capital required to launch enterprises and enter the formal sector, political choices surrounding these efforts are essential (Ali, 2020). Youth unemployment is a major problem in many nations, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, and governments there have launched several initiatives to empower youth via entrepreneurship (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
The Nigerian government, for example, has started initiatives such as Youth Enterprise with Innovation in Nigeria (YouWin), which offers financial support to young entrepreneurs so they may grow their companies and employ people in addition to themselves (Ogunniyi et al., 2020). To assist young people with interest-free loans and incentives for company growth, Kenya also established the Youth Empowerment Fund (Kenya Ministry of Youth Affairs, 2021). These initiatives show how company development and financial empowerment may directly lead to young employment through political will.
These initiatives are important, but they are frequently hampered by corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, and a lack of infrastructure, which can keep young people from fully benefiting from them. Sele and Wanjiku (2024) assert that effective funding distribution, open governance, and sufficient support systems like training and mentorship are necessary for the successful execution of youth-focused initiatives.
Youth employment outcomes are greatly impacted by labour market rules, especially when it comes to labour laws, minimum wage policy, and the informal sector. Fair employment practices, particularly for young people entering the market, depend on political frameworks that set labour norms and safeguard workers’ rights (Ilo, 2019). Many nations have passed minimum wage legislation to give workers a starting salary, however depending on political choices and the ability to enforce the rules, these laws may or may not be very successful.
For instance, Kenya’s minimum wage legislation aims to shield young labourers from being exploited in low-pay fields. However, many young people are still compelled to choose informal, low-paying occupations because of political pressure and a lack of enforcement (Oketch, 2017). Labour laws are also difficult to enforce in Nigeria, where young people work mostly in informal occupations without access to social security or other benefits (Adeleke, 2020). To enhance job circumstances for youngsters, political leadership should place a high priority on enforcing labour rules more equally across sectors and improving them (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
The ease with which young people might enter the official employment market is also influenced by labour legislation. Youth employment rates are often higher in nations with flexible labour markets, where policies encourage entrepreneurship and job creation. On the other hand, teenagers are frequently viewed as dangerous and inexperienced recruits, therefore companies may be discouraged from recruiting them if labour rules are too restrictive (World Bank, 2020). Political decisions on labour laws in this setting have the potential to either promote or inhibit young employment, underscoring the need of well-balanced and thoughtfully crafted economic policies (Ilo, 2019).
Local economies and the job prospects of young people are significantly impacted by globalization, which includes trade policy and foreign investment. Trade liberalization and foreign direct investment are two examples of global economic developments and policies that can either open new work prospects for young people or, on the other hand, cause job displacement and economic instability in sensitive sectors (Munyama, 2018). To ensure that local sectors stay competitive and can provide meaningful job opportunities for young people, political tactics must be adjusted to these global trends.
Both good and bad things might arise from globalization in terms of youth employment. On the one hand, it expands markets, draws in more foreign capital, encourages innovation, and generates new employment possibilities in sectors like manufacturing, services, and technology (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). However, nations that do not adjust to the global economy risk losing jobs, particularly in traditional industries like manufacturing and agriculture where youth employment is common (Bamber et al., 2018). To make sure that young people can take advantage of new possibilities in the global economy, political initiatives that encourage education and skill development are crucial (Oketch, 2017).
In Kenya, for example, trade liberalization and participation in regional economic communities such as the East African Community (EAC) have opened new markets and boosted employment prospects for young people in industries like services and technology (World Bank, 2021). The advantages of globalization are not dispersed equitably, though. To mitigate the negative consequences of globalization on young employment, political initiatives that promote inclusive growth and safeguard disadvantaged sectors are essential (Adeleke, 2020). The way that youth are positioned in the global economy is also influenced by political decisions made on trade agreements and commercial alliances.
Not only is youth unemployment a worldwide problem, but it is also a key area for policy change in many different nations and areas. We may find effective models that demonstrate how political stability, strategic policies, and educational changes can have a major impact on young employment outcomes by looking at various case studies. Based on educational and economic policies, this section will examine instances of nations that have either succeeded or failed in tackling young unemployment.
One of the best examples of how education changes might increase young employment is the dual education system in Germany. The program, which combines academic instruction with career training, has significantly decreased the youth unemployment rate, especially for those with different educational backgrounds. The system guarantees that students obtain both theoretical knowledge and practical skills by giving them the chance to have practical experience in companies in addition to receiving formal education (OECD, 2019).
Germany’s low young unemployment rates, which are far lower than the EU average, are attributed to the dual education paradigm (Jessen, 2021). Through a labour market-driven education system, the model facilitates a smooth transition for graduates into the workforce. Because of the system’s flexibility, it offers training in a variety of fields, including manufacturing and services. German businesses also make a significant contribution by collaborating with academic institutions to provide apprenticeships, which are essential for equipping students with marketable skills (Weber, 2020).
Due to its capacity to match educational objectives with labour market demands, the dual education system has proven successful in producing a trained labour force that appeals to employers. This strategy offers nations wishing to increase youth employment through educational changes a clear road map. Sele and Wanjiku (2024) assert that these kinds of programs also emphasise how crucial public-private alliances are to helping young people find jobs.
The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) area, in contrast to Germany, offers an illustration of how political instability may impede young employment despite high educational achievement. Countries with persistently high rates of young unemployment, like Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, highlight the difficulties in converting education into work. Young people looking for meaningful work face considerable obstacles because of political instability and weak economic growth (World Bank, 2021).
Many young individuals in these areas have advanced degrees, yet they frequently have trouble finding employment, especially in the formal economy. The mismatch between the skills that youth learn, and the needs of the job market is frequently cited as the cause of this conundrum (Roushdy & Sieverding, 2021). Political unrest deters foreign investment and the expansion of the private sector, two factors that are critical for the development of jobs, and many MENA nations have education systems that are inadequately matched with the demands of businesses (Ahmed, 2020). Moreover, the problem is made worse by the lack of comprehensive strategies to promote young employment and economic growth (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
Many young people have restricted economic options because of political instability, which has also resulted in the loss of infrastructure and a lack of political will to adopt effective employment programs. One of the greatest obstacles to increasing young employment in these areas is still the absence of inclusive governance and long-term political reforms. Therefore, to solve the issues of young unemployment in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), a comprehensive strategy involving political stabilization, educational reform, and economic diversification is required (Ali, 2020).
Rwanda is an example of a developing country that has effectively used political and economic strategies to empower young through digital literacy and tech skills, in contrast to the difficulties experienced by many MENA nations. Information and communication technology (ICT) has been a top priority for the Rwandan government since the early 2000s and is a fundamental component of its plan for economic growth. The larger Vision 2020 and Vision 2050 programs, which seek to turn Rwanda into a knowledge-based economy, include this emphasis (Rwanda Development Board, 2021).
Because of its emphasis on ICT education, Rwanda has made significant investments in digital infrastructure and is now one of Africa’s top technological centers. Young people can enroll in training programs in coding, software development, and digital entrepreneurship offered by the government in collaboration with commercial enterprises and international organizations (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). Young Rwandans now possess the skills necessary to prosper in the expanding tech sector thanks to initiatives like the Kigali Innovation City project and the establishment of ICT training facilities like the KLab (Bose, 2020).
Furthermore, Rwanda’s aggressive economic policies and political stability have created an atmosphere that is conducive to the growth of ICT enterprises and startups. Thousands of new jobs in the digital economy have been created because of the government’s focus on developing a legal framework that encourages tech entrepreneurship in conjunction with targeted youth employment initiatives (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024). Rwanda has transformed its youth unemployment rate through a mix of political decisions and education reforms, providing other developing nations with a useful lesson.
Although there are many examples of successful youth employment and education initiatives, several obstacles still prevent these initiatives from being as successful as they may be. The influence of global crises, political corruption, and a lack of political will are only a few of these barriers, which combine to obstruct the progress that many countries have achieved in tackling young unemployment. This section examines these important issues in detail and shows how they jeopardize economic and political programs designed to give youth access to jobs and education.
One major barrier to the creation of youth employment and education strategies continues to be political corruption. Corrupt political activities frequently lead to the misallocation of funds that should be used to assist programs aimed at promoting employment and education in various areas, particularly in developing countries. Resources are syphoned off for personal benefit or transferred to other less important areas, rather than funding vital sectors like infrastructure development, vocational training, and youth entrepreneurship initiatives (Mills, 2021).
For instance, in several African nations, political elites frequently embezzle public monies intended for youth initiatives in favour of transitory, patronage-driven initiatives that have no long-term effects on job or education. The African Development Bank (2020) claims that this improper distribution of funding restricts the reach of essential programs for young employment, including company grants, skill-building workshops, and education subsidies. As a result, even in the face of resources that could have been employed to solve these problems, youth unemployment rates remain high.
Political corruption also fosters an atmosphere in which the effectiveness of youth employment programs is undermined by the appointment of unfit or politically connected people to important positions. The lack of appropriate supervision and responsibility within these systems causes inefficiencies and hold-ups, making it more difficult for young people to get good jobs and education (Kaufmann et al., 2022).
Lack of political will frequently prevents youth-related policies and initiatives from achieving their intended goals, even when they are nominally accepted. Although political leaders, especially those in nations with conflicting agendas, may pledge to address teenage unemployment, their implementation attempts frequently fall short. When weighed against other concerns, such as national security or infrastructure development, young employment and education sometimes receive less attention than they should (Gibson, 2021).
For example, measures intended to increase young employment may exist on paper but lack the political impetus to be efficiently implemented in nations where political stability is shaky or where political institutions are not well coordinated. Sometimes, when early excitement wanes, youth-focused initiatives are abandoned, and subsequent governments neglect to give them top priority, resulting in disparate responses to the problem of unemployment (Thompson, 2021). Countries whose young unemployment is consistently high, even in the face of well-researched policies and frameworks intended to address the problem, bear the repercussions of this lack of political will.
Due to the intricacy of youths’ unemployment, a thorough, long-term strategy is needed. Political leaders frequently, however, choose quick fixes that can offer some relief in the short term but fail to address the structural problems that cause unemployment. Policies that just improve education or vocational training to create employment are unlikely to have a durable effect, especially in nations where globalization and technology improvements have changed the dynamics of the labour market (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
Global Crises and Shocks
Global catastrophes like the COVID-19 pandemic, economic downturns, and natural disasters linked to climate change have made it harder for young people to find work and pursue higher education in recent years. These outside shocks have the potential to destabilize economies, sabotage political decision-making, and take funds away from programs aimed at creating jobs and educating people.
For instance, young people have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 epidemic, with a sharp increase in the youth unemployment rate worldwide because of company closures and the migration of educational institutions to online platforms. Due to a large segment of the population lacking access to the required technology, many nations, particularly those in the developing world, had difficulties in offering effective online education (International Labour Organisation, 2020). Furthermore, the pandemic’s economic repercussions resulted in job losses in a variety of industries, with young people frequently being laid off first, thus decreasing their odds of finding work (World Bank, 2021).
Like this, worldwide economic downturns frequently lead to lower government income, which forces nations to slash public expenditure on social services and education, which disproportionately impacts youth. The 2008 financial crisis forced austerity measures on nations like Greece and Spain, which had a major negative impact on young unemployment and educational access (OECD, 2021). Youth employment programs and skill development are two important projects that have been underfunded, which has left young people with fewer options to better their economic prospects.
Additionally, there are serious risks to youth employment and education from climate change. Droughts, floods, and desertification are examples of climate-related catastrophes that can cause widespread job losses in areas where agriculture and natural resources play a significant economic role. This can make it more difficult for young people to enter the labour market. Governments may be compelled by these environmental crises to put emergency aid and disaster response ahead of long-term development objectives, such as reforming education and launching programs to help young people find work (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
Furthermore, governmental priorities frequently change in response to worldwide shocks, which pushes youth-related measures to the back burner. Even though youth are disproportionately affected by these concerns, governments may prioritize controlling public health emergencies or reacting to economic downturns above resolving young unemployment when faced with pressing crises. In these situations, the approach to youth employment shifts from being proactive to reactive, and long-term plans that are required to give young people stable jobs are frequently overlooked (Mills, 2021).
To effectively tackle the problems of young unemployment and education, officials must implement all-encompassing, long-term plans that incorporate economic empowerment and education. With a focus on inclusion, economic policies, and education, this section offers a few vital suggestions that will support the creation of an environment that is conducive to the growth of young people.
Putting money into education is the cornerstone of every strategy to combat youth unemployment. Long-term education investments that are in line with the needs of the contemporary labour market must be given top priority by policymakers. This involves emphasizing digital literacy, entrepreneurship abilities, and STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects. Education systems need to change as technology continues to impact the world economy to prepare students for careers in fields like artificial intelligence, data science, IT, and digital entrepreneurship (World Economic Forum, 2022).
To guarantee that the curriculum is by the demands of the labour market, governments should provide more funds for the establishment of technical colleges and vocational training centres that provide chances for experiential learning. They should also form collaborations with private sector businesses. Access to education should be improved as a priority for policies, especially for young people living in underserved or rural regions. This might involve programs like financial aid, scholarships, and subsidies for students from low-income households, as well as the development of digital learning platforms to close the access gap in underdeveloped areas (UNESCO, 2020).
Furthermore, it is important to highlight the importance of digital literacy as a talent for entrepreneurship as well as future jobs. As technology-based services expand and more firms shift to online platforms, young individuals with strong digital abilities will have an advantage in the job market. To provide adolescents with the skills they need to engage in the global digital economy, policies should encourage educational institutions to incorporate coding, digital marketing, and e-commerce into their curricula (OECD, 2021).
It is imperative for political leaders to implement youth-centric economic policies to foster a conducive climate for young employment and entrepreneurship. Governments ought to encourage the formation of new companies by offering a variety of incentives, such as tax breaks, grants, and subsidies, with a focus on companies that employ young people or are headed by young entrepreneurs. Public-private partnerships, in which the business community works with governmental organizations to support young entrepreneurs and start-ups with resources, capital, and mentorship, should also be promoted.
To strategically promote employment development, national economic strategies should incorporate youth entrepreneurship programs. Young individuals with an entrepreneurial drive confront obstacles including lack of funding, mentoring, and training in many different nations. It is recommended that policymakers enable the establishment of venture capital funds or microfinance alternatives targeted exclusively at the youth to support the launch and growth of firms. Governments can also set up business incubators and accelerators, which offer crucial assistance to young entrepreneurs in navigating the initial phases of business creation. This assistance can include workspace, business guidance, and seed capital (Sele & Wanjiku, 2024).
Making sure that these economic policies are inclusive and accessible is a crucial component of this recommendation, with a focus on young people living in rural areas and people with disabilities who may encounter additional obstacles when trying to start their businesses or find employment (International Labour Organisation, 2020). Governments must collaborate with commercial businesses, educational institutions, and civil society organizations to create an inclusive environment that supports the goals of all young people, regardless of their socioeconomic status.
Policies that successfully support youth employment and education must be inclusive and consider the needs of marginalized groups, including young people from low-income households, those from rural regions, and those with disabilities. Adopting an inclusive strategy guarantees equitable chances for all young people, especially those who encounter structural obstacles, to engage in the labour market and get high-quality education. Thus, legislators ought to support measures that advance equitable access to jobs and education, giving special consideration to the difficulties encountered by young people from marginalized communities.
This may be accomplished by making sure that youth policies are created with an explicit emphasis on equality, considering the needs of marginalized groups. To meet the requirements of children with disabilities, inclusive education policies should, for example, provide accessible learning spaces, assistive technology, and qualified instructors who can work with kids who have a variety of learning needs (UNICEF, 2021). Initiatives to promote employment should also focus on creating jobs in rural regions, where young unemployment is often greater owing to restricted access to metropolitan job markets and resources. This will help marginalized populations that are targeted.
The local community groups and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that are most suited to engage marginalized youth should also be encouraged to participate in policy frameworks. These groups may be crucial in organizing assistance for young people who are marginalized and making sure that they have access to programs that improve their employability and teach them life skills (World Bank, 2021).
As this study draws to a close, it’s critical to remember that combating youth unemployment necessitates a multifaceted strategy centred on significant investments in education, the development of economic policies specifically targeted at young people, and the assurance of inclusion in policy design. When it comes to putting policies into place that guarantee youth have access to good education and employment prospects, political leaders are essential. Governments can unleash the potential of youth to propel economic growth and development in the years to come by creating conditions where young people are supported by inclusive economic policies and have access to the necessary skills.
In summary, the paper has shown how closely related and mutually supportive political policies, economic empowerment, and education are. The youth are an important source of creativity and progress, but their potential is frequently limited by weak political frameworks, insufficient economic possibilities, and poor educational systems. As we’ve looked at, combating youth unemployment necessitates a comprehensive strategy that acknowledges the importance of each of these elements in creating an atmosphere that supports youth empowerment over the long run.
The Interconnectedness of Education, Economic Empowerment, and Political Policies
The foundation for establishing young employment is education. Through the provision of academic, technical, or entrepreneurial skills to young people, society may foster a workforce that is creative, competitive, and flexible enough to meet the ever-changing needs of the global economy. But education on its own is insufficient. In the absence of laws that facilitate economic prospects for young people, even those with the best qualifications could find it difficult to get employment. Policies that link educational attainment to the demands of the labor market are therefore desperately needed.
Education and employment results are directly and significantly impacted by political decisions. Political leaders create the framework for youth development by establishing labour laws, developing curricula, and allocating funds. Furthermore, to encourage young people to become economically independent, legislative policies should promote youth-focused economic initiatives like start-up incubators and entrepreneurship awards. A potent synergy that empowers young economically and contributes to the advancement of the nation results when governmental frameworks offer incentives for job creation and innovation and education systems are matched with the demands of the labor market.
The Importance of Well-Crafted Political Policies in Empowering Youth
This article’s thesis is simple yet profound: well-crafted political policies are fundamental to empowering youth economically. Long-term growth may be sustained via the implementation of policies that combine economic empowerment programs with reforms in education. Governments need to understand that funding youth education is an investment in both the prosperity of nations as a whole and in the future of the people involved. Even the most talented young people will have difficulty finding employment or launching enterprises without sufficient governmental backing.
Moreover, nations need to create policies that account for emerging patterns as the world economy is more linked and impacted by technical and digital advancements. Education systems that prioritize digital literacy, STEM, and entrepreneurship can help governments provide youth with the skills they need to prosper in a global marketplace that is changing quickly.
Governments, educational institutions, and the corporate sector must now work together to make sure that youth are sufficiently equipped for the demands of the contemporary workforce. To foster the development of young talent, governments must take the initiative to create inclusive, equal, and progressive policies. This entails a dedication to boosting educational spending, fostering an environment that is conducive to young employment, and making sure that underprivileged populations are not forgotten.
In addition, academic institutions have a responsibility to ensure that their curriculum reflects the demands of the labour market, promotes critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving abilities, and provides students with practical experience through collaborations with the commercial sector, internships, and apprenticeships. Furthermore, collaborations between the business community and academic institutions are essential to guarantee that youth have the training they need to not only find employment but also to innovate and start new businesses.
The private sector needs to accept its responsibility for giving young people access to work possibilities, whether that takes the form of direct hiring, business mentoring, or investments in youth entrepreneurship. By doing this, the private sector may access a plethora of unrealized potential and support an inventive and thriving economy.
Collaboration between all society players, including governments, educational institutions, and the commercial sector, is the key to empowering young people. When they work together, they can build an ecosystem that gives young people the resources, chances, and encouragement they need to thrive in a world that is changing quickly. Through the alignment of education with the demands of the market and the implementation of well-crafted, inclusive policies, we can optimize young potential, stimulate economic expansion, and guarantee improved prospects for all.
Adeleke, A. (2020). The role of entrepreneurship education in addressing youth unemployment in Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 14(4), 150-161.
Ahmed, M. (2020). Political instability and youth unemployment in the MENA region: An empirical analysis. Middle East Economic Review, 19(3), 82-97.
Ali, M. (2020). Youth entrepreneurship and the future of employment in Africa. Journal of African Economic Development, 32(2), 45-61.
Bamber, P., et al. (2018). Globalization and job creation: The role of political strategies. Journal of International Economics, 112(1), 102-120.
Bose, K. (2020). Rwanda’s path to ICT-driven growth: Lessons from Vision 2020. Journal of Development Economics, 21(4), 135-146.
Global Partnership for Education. (2019). Transforming education in developing countries: Building partnerships for better outcomes. Global Partnership for Education.
Gibson, R. (2021). Political will and the implementation of youth employment policies. Journal of Public Policy and Youth Development, 19(2), 98-115.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). The economic impacts of learning losses. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 225. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/21908d74-en
ILO. (2021). Skills development in the time of COVID-19: Taking stock of the initial responses in technical and vocational education and training. International Labour Organization.
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2020). The role of youth in post-COVID-19 economic recovery. Geneva: ILO.
International Labour Organization. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on youth employment. Geneva: ILO.
Jessen, M. (2021). The success of Germany’s dual education system. European Journal of Education Policy, 9(1), 50-67.
Johnson, M., & Lopez, R. (2022). Global education policies in the 21st century: A comparative analysis of educational reforms. Oxford University Press.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2022). Governance matters 2022: Worldwide governance indicators. The World Bank.
Kenya Ministry of Youth Affairs. (2021). Youth Empowerment Fund: An overview. Government of Kenya.
Mills, C. (2021). The role of corruption in hindering youth employment policies. Journal of African Economic Development, 27(3), 240-255.
Munyama, S. (2018). The impact of trade policies on youth employment in Africa. African Trade Review, 9(3), 123-137.
OECD. (2019). Youth employment in OECD countries: The case of the dual education system in Germany. OECD Employment Outlook 2019.
OECD. (2020). Youth unemployment in developing regions: A policy analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2021). The financial crisis and youth employment: The impact of austerity in Europe. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2021). Youth and digitalization: Policy strategies for education and employment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Oketch, M. (2017). Vocational education and training in sub-Saharan Africa: Learning from country experiences. International Journal of Educational Development, 5(3), 31-44.
Roushdy, R., & Sieverding, M. (2021). Youth education and employment in the Middle East and North Africa: A growing paradox. International Journal of Labor Economics, 7(2), 78-95.
Sele, J. P., & Wanjiku, C. (2024). The role of education in economic development: A comparative study of Nigeria and Kenya. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2024.2.093024121
Sele, J. P., & Wanjiku, C. (2024). Theology of development: Addressing poverty and inequality in Nigeria and Kenya. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2024.2.093024123
Smith, A. (2023). Youth employment in the digital age: Bridging the skills gap. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, R. (2021). Youth employment in times of political transition. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(1), 134-150.
UNDP. (2019). Youth employment in sub-Saharan Africa: Policy perspectives for change. United Nations Development Programme.
UNESCO. (2020). Future of Education: Reimagining Education for Global Challenges. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNICEF. (2021). Disability-inclusive education: What is the role of policy? Retrieved from www.unicef.org.
Weber, C. (2020). Apprenticeships and youth employment in the German dual education system. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(1), 14-29.
World Bank. (2020). World development report: The role of education in economic growth. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. (2021). Kenya: Trade, development, and employment opportunities in the regional economy. Washington, D.C.
World Bank. (2021). Fostering inclusive youth employment in developing economies. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank. (2021). The state of global youth employment: Challenges and policy responses. World Bank Publications.
World Bank. (2021). Global economic downturn and youth unemployment: An analysis of the COVID-19 crisis. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Economic Forum. (2022). Digital skills for the future of work. Geneva: WEF.
World Economic Forum. (2022). The future of jobs report 2022. Geneva: WEF.
John Philip Sele is a scholar with a rich academic background, currently pursuing a Master’s degree in Development Studies with a focus on the Theology of Development. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Theology and a minor in Development Studies from Africa International University (AIU), Nairobi, Kenya. His academic and professional journey reflects a deep commitment to integrating theology with development principles as he authored the blog, Theology of Development (https://theologydev.com). He hails from Jos, Nigeria.
Sele serves as a lecturer of Development Studies at Africa International University (AIU). His work in academia and development is informed by years of leadership experience, including his tenure as the International Students Representative at AIU, and the Chief Executive Officer of Content Creators Hub. As Deputy Vice Chancellor for Administration at ASCEN University, Liberia, he oversees strategic administrative operations and promotes a culture of excellence and diversity.
His scholarly work is underpinned by a commitment to community engagement, practical theology, governance and politics, resource mobilization, and social justice, with a focus on empowering marginalized communities, particularly in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. His current research interests include governance, social inclusion, and the theology of development, with a particular emphasis on their practical implications in the African context.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9637-5071
Mark B. Mukundi is a rising authority in education who is deeply passionate about both teaching and research. At Nairobi Waldorf School, Mark is a committed Geography and Kiswahili teacher who blends his professional background with academic understanding to encourage and foster a love of learning in his pupils. With a foundation in teaching, he studied for a Bachelor of Education at Africa International University, where he is still making great progress as a leader and scholar.
Mark is a young, enthusiastic researcher who is dedicated to improving education via a range of studies that examine the relationships between politics, the economy, governance, social life, and education. His writing and teaching style, which integrates these important topics to provide a comprehensive view on learning and development, reflect his varied academic interests. His goal is to work as an International Baccalaureate (IB) teacher, using his background in education and the demands of global education to have a significant effect on the sector.
Mark demonstrates his great organizational and leadership abilities in his role as Secretary General of the Students’ Council at Africa International University. He is known as a devoted and passionate leader because of his capacity to mentor and uplift both pupils and peers. Through his leadership position, he keeps improving the quality of life for students, advancing his career and his goal of making education better overall.
Mark, who is originally from Kenya’s Tharaka Nithi County, is dedicated to education outside of the classroom. His quest of practical solutions that improve the educational environment, along with his active pursuit of scholarly endeavors, make him a promising figure in education.
Sele, JP; Mukundi, MB (2024). Education and Economic Empowerment: How Political Policies Shape the Future of Youth Employment. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2): 175-186. https://doi.org/10.15580/gjss.2024.2.102024136
Download [493.59 KB]
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment *
Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Post Comment
