Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake among Female Medical Students at Rivers State University, Nigeria

Advertisements
Greener Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health

ISSN: 2354-2381

Vol. 14(1), pp. 6-13, 2026

Copyright ©2026, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

https://gjournals.org/GJEPH

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15580/gjeph.2026.1.020526024

GJEPH Logo

Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake among Female Medical Students at Rivers State University, Nigeria

Adetomi Bademosi1; Ifeoma Nwadiuto1*; Aku-Emmanuel, Divine Chukwuemeka2; Henry, Divine-Favour Chinyere2

1Department of Community Medicine, College of Clinical Sciences, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

2Department of Community Medicine, College of Medical Sciences, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

ARTICLE’S INFO

Article No.: 020526024

Type: Research

Full Text: PDF, PHP, HTML, EPUB, MP3

DOI: 10.15580/gjeph.2026.1.020526024

Accepted: 10/02/2026

Published: 23/02/2026

 

*Corresponding Author

Ifeoma Nwadiuto

Email: ifynwadiuto@yahoo.com

Phone: +2348033124314

Keywords: Human papillomavirus; HPV vaccination; Vaccine uptake; Determinants; Medical students; Nigeria; Cervical cancer prevention

       

ABSTRACT

  Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the leading cause of cervical cancer, a major public health burden in Nigeria. Despite the availability of effective prophylactic vaccines, uptake remains critically low, even among high-risk and informed groups such as medical students.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and identify the key determinants of HPV vaccine uptake among female medical students at Rivers State University.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 214 female students from the College of Medical Sciences, selected via multistage random sampling. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. Variables included socio-demographics, sexual history, knowledge of HPV and the vaccine, and vaccination status. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 27, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression.

Results: The mean age of respondents was 20.8 ± 2.8 years. Only 21.0% (n=45) had received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine, and 11.2% (n=24) were fully vaccinated. Uptake was significantly higher among students aged 21–25 years (34.4% vs. 9.8%, p<0.001), those in higher academic levels (69.2% in 600-level vs. 0% in 100-level, p<0.001), those who were sexually active (36.2% vs. 13.8%, p<0.001), and those with good knowledge of the HPV vaccine (37.8% vs. 0%, p<0.001). Willingness to pay for the vaccine was also a significant predictor (25.7% vs. 11.4%, p=0.016). Major barriers included lack of awareness (22%), high cost (45%), and not knowing where to access the vaccine (30%).

Conclusion: HPV vaccine uptake among female medical students remains unacceptably low, driven by knowledge gaps, financial barriers, and poor access. Targeted interventions, including institutional vaccination programs, subsidized costs, and comprehensive education campaigns, are urgently needed to improve coverage in this key demographic.

   

1. INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer constitutes a significant global health challenge, with an estimated 604,000 new cases and 342,000 deaths in 2020 alone [1]. In Nigeria, it is the third most common cancer among women and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women aged 15–44 years, presenting a critical public health burden [2]. Virtually all cervical cancer cases are attributable to persistent infection with high-risk strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV), particularly types 16 and 18 [3].

The development of prophylactic HPV vaccines represents a landmark achievement in preventive oncology. Vaccines such as the bivalent (Cervarix®), quadrivalent (Gardasil®), and nonavalent (Gardasil 9®) formulations have demonstrated high efficacy in preventing infection from the most oncogenic HPV types and subsequent precancerous lesions [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends vaccination for girls aged 9–14 years, ideally before sexual debut, and has endorsed a single-dose schedule as a viable strategy to improve coverage [5]. This forms a cornerstone of the WHO’s Global Strategy to Eliminate Cervical Cancer, which targets 90% HPV vaccination coverage among girls by 2030 [5].

Despite this clear preventive pathway, HPV vaccine uptake remains inadequate worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria. Globally, only about 31% of girls have received at least one dose, and a mere 21% have completed the full series [6]. In Nigeria, studies consistently report alarmingly low uptake, with rates ranging from 2.6% to 5.1% among young women and female undergraduates [7,8]. Systemic barriers, including high vaccine cost, limited availability, pervasive misinformation, and weak immunization infrastructure, perpetuate this coverage gap [9].

Medical students represent a unique and crucial demographic. As future healthcare providers, they can significantly influence community norms and patient recommendations through their personal health behaviours and professional attitudes. They are also within the catch-up vaccination age range (15–26 years). However, evidence suggests a persistent knowledge-practice gap even within this group, in which high general awareness of HPV does not translate into personal vaccination [10,11]. In Nigeria, studies among health science students have reported uptake rates as low as 3.7% to 14.0% [12,13].

There is a paucity of recent, context-specific data on HPV vaccine uptake and its determinants among medical students in southern Nigeria. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the pattern, prevalence, and key determinants of HPV vaccine uptake among female medical students at Rivers State University. The findings are intended to inform targeted interventions at the institutional and policy levels to improve vaccine acceptance and contribute to national cervical cancer prevention goals.

2. METHODS

2.1. Study Design and Setting

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between July and September 2025 at the College of Medical Sciences, Rivers State University (RSU), Port Harcourt, Nigeria. RSU is a state-owned university located in the capital of Rivers State, a metropolitan area in Nigeria’s South-South geopolitical zone.

2.2. Study Population

The study population comprised full-time female undergraduate students from five departments within the College of Medical Sciences: Medicine and Surgery, Nursing, Radiology, Physiotherapy, and Public Health. Students at levels 100 to 600 who had been enrolled for at least six months were eligible. Male students and those on long-term leave or exchange programs were excluded.

2.3. Sample Size and Sampling Technique

The minimum sample size was calculated as 206 using the Cochran formula for cross-sectional studies, with a 95% confidence level, a 5% margin of error, and an estimated prevalence (p) of 14.0% from a previous study [13]. A multistage sampling technique was employed:

  • Stage 1: Stratification by department.
  • Stage 2: Proportional allocation of the sample size to each department based on student population.
  • Stage 3: Simple random sampling of eligible students from each stratum using student rosters.

2.4. Data Collection Instrument and Procedure

Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire developed from literature review and pretested. The instrument comprised four sections:

  • Section A: Socio-demographic characteristics and sexual history.
  • Section B: Knowledge of HPV infection and transmission.
  • Section C: Knowledge and awareness of the HPV vaccine.
  • Section D: HPV vaccination status, patterns, and attitudes.

Questionnaires were distributed electronically via Google Forms and in hard copy. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection.

2.5. Measurement of Variables

  • Primary Outcome: HPV vaccine uptake was a dichotomous variable (Yes/No) defined as self-reported receipt of at least one dose of any HPV vaccine.
  • Full Vaccination: Completion of the recommended series: ≥2 doses if the first dose was before age 15, or ≥3 doses if the first dose was at age 15 or older.
  • Knowledge Scores: Knowledge of HPV and the HPV vaccine was assessed using multiple-choice questions. Correct answers were summed, and total scores were categorized as Good (≥75%), Fair (50–74%), or Poor (<50%).
  • Determinants: Independent variables included age, department, level of study, ethnicity, religion, sexual activity, knowledge scores, and willingness to pay for the vaccine.

2.6. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Associations between vaccine uptake and independent variables were examined using the Chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate). Binary logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of vaccine uptake, with results expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

2.7. Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee (Ref: RSUTH/REC/2025/06/123). Permission was granted by the College administration. Participation was voluntary, anonymous, and based on written informed consent. All data were kept confidential.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Socio-demographic Characteristics of Respondents

A total of 214 female students participated, yielding a response rate of 95%. The mean age was 20.8 ± 2.8 years, with the majority (52.3%) aged 16–20 years. Most respondents were from the Department of Medicine and Surgery (60.7%) and were in their fourth year of study (36.4%). Christianity was the predominant religion (98.6%), and 67.8% reported never having had sexual intercourse. (Table 1).

Table 1: Socio-demographic Characteristics of Participants (N=214)

Characteristic Category Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Age Group (Years) 16 – 20 112 52.3
  21 – 25 93 43.5
  26 – 30 6 2.8
  31 – 35 3 1.4
Department Medicine & Surgery 130 60.7
  Nursing 54 25.2
  Physiotherapy 12 5.6
  Public Health 10 4.7
  Radiology 8 3.7
Level of Study 100 21 9.8
  200 18 8.4
  300 19 8.9
  400 78 36.4
  500 52 24.3
  600 26 12.1
Ever had sex Yes 69 32.2
  No 145 67.8

3.2. Prevalence and Pattern of HPV Vaccination

Only 45 students (21.0%) reported having received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine. Of these, 24 (53.3% of vaccinated, 11.2% of total) were fully vaccinated. Among the vaccinated, 45.7% had received three doses, and 84.4% received their first dose during the catch-up age of 15–26 years. The most common vaccination site was a school-based program or university clinic (44.4%) (Table 2).

Table 2: Pattern of HPV Vaccination among Participants (n=45 vaccinated)

Variable Category Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Number of Doses Received One dose 14 31.1
  Two doses 9 20.0
  Three doses 21 45.7
  Four doses 1 2.2
Age at First Dose 9 – 14 years (Recommended) 6 13.3
  15 – 26 years (Catch-up) 38 84.4
  ≥27 years 1 2.2
Place of Vaccination School/University Clinic 20 44.4
  Primary Health Care Centre 12 26.7
  General Hospital 5 11.1
  Health Outreach Campaign 4 8.9
  Tertiary Hospital 3 6.7
  Private Hospital 1 2.2

3.3. Knowledge of HPV and HPV Vaccine

General awareness of HPV was high: 92.1% had heard of HPV, and 95.8% correctly identified it as a viral infection. However, knowledge about the vaccine was poorer. Only 53.7% knew the ideal vaccination age (9–14 years), and 66.8% knew the correct number of doses. Overall, 64.0% had good general HPV knowledge, but only 38.3% had good knowledge specifically about the HPV vaccine (Table 3).

Table 3: Knowledge of HPV and HPV Vaccine among Participants (N=214)

Knowledge Item Correct Response n (%)
Heard of HPV 197 (92.1)
HPV is caused by a virus 205 (95.8)
HPV is transmitted through sexual intercourse 200 (93.5)
HPV can cause cervical cancer 167 (78.0)
HPV can cause genital warts 139 (65.0)
Heard of HPV vaccine 184 (86.0)
Knew ideal age for vaccination (9-14 years) 115 (53.7)
Knew correct number of doses (2-3) 143 (66.8)
Knew where to get vaccinated 161 (75.2)

3.4. Factors Associated with HPV Vaccine Uptake

Bivariate analysis revealed several factors significantly associated with vaccine uptake (Table 4). Uptake was significantly higher among:

  • Older students (21–25 years: 34.4% vs. 16–20 years: 9.8%; p<0.001)
  • Senior students (600-level: 69.2% vs. 100-level: 0%; p<0.001)
  • Those who were sexually active (36.2% vs. 13.8%; p<0.001)
  • Those with good HPV vaccine knowledge (37.8% vs. poor: 0%; p<0.001)
  • Those willing to pay for the vaccine (25.7% vs. 11.4%; p=0.016)

Department and general HPV knowledge level were not significantly associated with uptake.

Table 4: Factors Associated with HPV Vaccine Uptake (Bivariate Analysis)

Factor Vaccinated n/N (%) χ² (p-value)
Age Group   18.839 (<0.001)**
16-20 years 11/112 (9.8)  
21-25 years 32/93 (34.4)  
Level of Study   51.420 (<0.001)**
100 0/21 (0.0)  
600 18/26 (69.2)  
Sexual Activity   14.175 (<0.001)**
Yes 25/69 (36.2)  
No 20/145 (13.8)  
HPV Vaccine Knowledge   27.003 (<0.001)**
Good 31/82 (37.8)  
Poor 0/44 (0.0)  
Willing to Pay   5.773 (0.016)*
Yes 37/144 (25.7)  
No 8/70 (11.4)  
  • p<0.05, ** p<0.001

In binary logistic regression, after adjusting for confounders, being in a higher academic level (aOR=1.6, 95% CI: 1.3–2.0) and having good HPV vaccine knowledge (aOR=4.5, 95% CI: 1.5–13.2) remained independent predictors of vaccine uptake.

3.5. Reasons for Non-Vaccination

Among the 169 unvaccinated students, the most cited barriers were: high cost (45%), not knowing where to get the vaccine (30%), lack of awareness of the vaccine (22%), and perceived low risk or lack of necessity (40%). Safety concerns accounted for 15% of responses.

Figure 1: Reasons for Non-Vaccination Among Female Medical Students (Multiple Responses Allowed)

text

High Cost █████████████████ (45%)

Don’t Know Where to Get It ███████████ (30%)

Lack of Awareness ███████ (22%)

Perceived Low Risk/Not Necessary ████████████████ (40%)

Safety Concerns █████ (15%)

(Note: Figure is a textual representation of a bar chart)

4. DISCUSSION

This study revealed a low prevalence of HPV vaccination (21.0%) among female medical students at Rivers State University, with only about half of those initiating vaccination completing the recommended series. These findings are consistent with previous studies in Nigeria and other LMICs, underscoring a critical gap in cervical cancer prevention among a group expected to be at the forefront of health advocacy [12,13].

The significant association between higher academic level and vaccine uptake suggests that prolonged medical education may increase exposure to information about HPV-related cancers, thereby influencing health-seeking behavior. This aligns with studies that found clinical rotations and oncology modules to be catalysts for vaccination among medical students [10,14]. The strong link between good vaccine-specific knowledge and uptake highlights that general awareness of HPV is insufficient; detailed understanding of the vaccine’s schedule, efficacy, and accessibility is crucial for decision-making. This corroborates findings from India and Saudi Arabia, where knowledge gaps directly predicted low uptake [15,16].

Contrary to the ideal of vaccination before sexual debut, our study found that sexually active students were more likely to be vaccinated. This may indicate a reactive rather than preventive approach, where perceived personal risk triggers action. It underscores the need to emphasize the benefits of pre-exposure vaccination within health education.

The financial barrier remains paramount, as identified in similar settings across sub-Saharan Africa [9,17]. The high out-of-pocket cost of the HPV vaccine in Nigeria is a formidable obstacle for students. The recent introduction of the HPV vaccine into Nigeria’s national immunization schedule for younger adolescents is a positive step, but catch-up campaigns for older cohorts like university students are urgently needed [18].

The role of institutional health services is evident, as the most common vaccination site was the school/university clinic. This presents a clear opportunity: integrating affordable or subsidized HPV vaccination into campus health services could dramatically improve access and uptake, as demonstrated by successful school-based programs in Rwanda and Botswana [19,20].

4.1. Limitations

This study has limitations. Its cross-sectional design precludes causal inferences. The use of self-reported vaccination status may be subject to recall bias. The study was conducted in a single institution, which may limit generalizability. Nevertheless, the robust sampling method and high response rate strengthen the validity of the findings.

5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

HPV vaccine uptake among female medical students at Rivers State University is low, driven by inadequate vaccine-specific knowledge, financial constraints, and access barriers. Despite their medical training, these students are not adequately protected against a preventable cause of cervical cancer.

To address this, we recommend:

  1. Institutional Action: The University Health Service should establish a routine, subsidized HPV vaccination program for all students, coupled with mandatory education sessions during orientation.
  2. Curriculum Review: The medical curriculum should be enhanced to include detailed, practical modules on HPV vaccination guidelines and advocacy.
  3. Policy Advocacy: The Nigerian government and health agencies should expand national HPV vaccination campaigns to include catch-up vaccination for young adults in tertiary institutions.
  4. Public-Private Partnerships: Partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and NGOs could facilitate vaccine donation or discount programs for university students.
  5. Digital Interventions: Utilize SMS and social media reminders for dose completion and to disseminate credible information countering vaccine misinformation.

By implementing these multi-level strategies, Nigeria can improve HPV vaccine coverage among future healthcare professionals, thereby protecting their health and empowering them to become effective advocates for cervical cancer elimination in their communities.

6. DECLARATIONS

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. Participation was voluntary and anonymity was maintained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors’ contributions

Aku-Emmanuel DC and Henry DF conceptualized the study, supervised data collection, performed data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. Nwadiuto I and Bademosi A provided methodological oversight, critically reviewed the manuscript for intellectual content, and approved the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
  2. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer. Nigeria Human Papillomavirus and Related Cancers, Fact Sheet 2023. https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/NGA_FS.pdf
  3. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12-19. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F
  4. Drolet M, Bénard É, Pérez N, et al. Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;394(10197):497-509. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30298-3
  5. World Health Organization. Cervical cancer elimination initiative. 2020. https://www.who.int/initiatives/cervical-cancer-elimination-initiative
  6. Bruni L, Saura-Lázaro A, Montoliu A, et al. HPV vaccination introduction worldwide and WHO and UNICEF estimates of national HPV immunization coverage 2010–2019. Prev Med. 2021;144:106399. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106399
  7. Okagbue HI, Erekosima G, Sampson S, et al. Predictors of willingness of HPV vaccine uptake across Eight States in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22000-2
  8. Isara AR, Osayi N. Knowledge of Human Papillomavirus and Uptake of its Vaccine among Female Undergraduate Students of Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria. J Community Med Prim Health Care. 2021;33(1):64-75.
  9. Wigle J, Coast E, Watson-Jones D. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine implementation in low and middle-income countries (LMICs): Health system experiences and prospects. Vaccine. 2013;31(37):3811-3817. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.016
  10. Bunting SR, Morris S, Chael J. Knowledge of human papillomavirus vaccination: A multi-institution, cross-sectional study of allopathic and osteopathic medical students. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0260718. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260718
  11. Iliyasu Z, Lawan UM, Muhammad AA, Abubakar SM. Correlates of human papillomavirus vaccine knowledge and acceptability among medical and allied health students in Northern Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(6):844-853. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_564_20
  12. Onowhakpor A, Onwuzuruigbo S, Enyindah CE. Knowledge, attitude, and uptake of human papillomavirus vaccination among medical and paramedical students in a Nigerian tertiary health institution. J Med Sci. 2021;41(2):79-87.
  13. Ihudiebube-Splendor CN, Igwe PN, Uwakwe KA, Duru CB. Knowledge, Attitude and Uptake of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Female Undergraduates in Lagos State, Nigeria. J Community Health Res. 2019;8(4):221-228.
  14. Mehta SD, Smith JS, Zhu S. Knowledge of human papillomavirus and receipt of human papillomavirus vaccine among US medical students: a need for greater education. Vaccine. 2013;31(50):6032-6036. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.052
  15. Raychaudhuri S, Mandal R. A study investigating the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of HPV vaccination in India involved 957 medical and paramedical students. J Med Sci. 2012;3(2):123-128.
  16. Alshammari KR, Alotaibi FS, Alahmari FA, Alawad AA, Alshammari NA. An investigation into the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination among undergraduate medical students (A prospective cross-sectional KAP survey). Open Gynae Obstet J. 2024;18(2).
  17. Egbon M, Ojo T, Aliyu A, Bagudu ZS. Challenges and lessons from a school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program for adolescent girls in a rural Nigerian community. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1611. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14000-3
  18. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Nigeria to vaccinate 7.7 million girls against leading cause of cervical cancer. News release, 24 Oct 2023. https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/nigeria-vaccinate-77-million-girls-against-leading-cause-cervical-cancer
  19. Binagwaho A, Wagner CM, Gatera M, Karema C, Nutt CT, Ngabo F. Achieving high coverage in Rwanda’s national human papillomavirus vaccination programme. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:623-628. doi:10.2471/BLT.11.097253
  20. Durando P, Faust H, Hainaut P, et al. Implementation of HPV vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: A public health challenge with immense potential. Vaccine. 2022;40(Suppl 1):A1-A4. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.039.

Cite this Article:

Bademosi, A; Nwadiuto, I; Aku-Emmanuel, DC; Henry, DC (2026). Determinants of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake among Female Medical Students at Rivers State University, Nigeria. Greener Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 14(1): 6-13, https://doi.org/10.15580/gjeph.2026.1.020526024.

PDF VIEWER

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download [455.99 KB]

.

Loading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *